Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAssignees, Receivers, and Trustees 1896 (File 3)1896 Transcript of Judgment.—printed and for sale at the Laxpu( np Jos Orrick, Statesville, N. C. TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENT. Plaintiff..62 Orr ) i c# cheer , +e I CER ‘hit hosters a’true“I'ranscript from my Docket of the Judgment bysne. Justice of the Peace. | TRANSGRPT OF JUDGMENT. pyle Be of See , \ 1 a Vi : J Witnt. & eS Se Eay\ 995 ~ Che Le (GE AK Loa H ~ Ane Gone AL. of Binns again WEE by Fara Big Vee Owl et en Beni Glee Cy - 2 aie mad « ff — Wa - : ~ Po a / Yf. ey eee E Yili Hild hR Nfanafactaers of. hhiits Goll Safle Dayallein New Got Panis Goins: : 11| Lb “PHILADELPHIA. t4 South Fitth Street. wo . 2 Kingston *®.. ™ : 'ATEMENT. | Folio © % ¢! ’ — toto mM ny A PP? eg a P. O.Box 2819. TERMS NET CASH,!IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. Lg. CLARKS “O.N.F.* SPOOL COTTON. SOF AE! Kece JO | Giese F, SOAS cm eet PL | | Laie uw a EEG HT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, DEDUCT MONT Pg AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. x | PER | | CASES. PKGES. LBS. CUBIC FEET. NOS. i j Anreovee CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 307% AWD DECEMBER 318 BILLS NOT PAID WHEN DUE SUBJECT TO ORAFT. aD Ape. (HAG \ co Wh eo eo Ctra tl ae. Colter cv, P. O.Box 2919. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. ed Gre Cg. Me | ij | i | hoy. CLARKS “O.N.T.* SPOOL COTTON. ~~) xute ce a Sie sipep MOTI A Omad Cc WABEIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, DEDUCT AMOU ETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. PER | CASES. PKGES. LBS. CUBIC FEET. NOS, | : | ae CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 30" AN DECEMBER ate BILLS NOT PAID WHEN OUE SUBJECT TO ORAFT. “7 York, CHr£ So wee CUantla ee aoa FP. O.Box 2919. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. . CLARES “O.N. T." SPOOL COTTON. | ve oo | Oe ne Gof, _M% 5. FA 6 | | | IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, pe DEDUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. Perry 2. é— epee { nef | a PKGES. oJ LBS. CUBIC FEET. Nob. | | i et Rlitnene re oLAMs FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 3pTr Ayo DECEMBER 3187 BILLS NOT PAID WHEN QUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. P. O.Box 2019. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. | Gey. CLARKS “ON. T.* SPOOL COTTON. | a g- | Keay of LP VE ass _ een tv S e Cte ea A) ar. en 3 | A 4 Pi~ af oe IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, _——_DEDUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT. AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. PKGES. . CUBIC FEET. NQS. apeene O CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 30% AND DECEMBER 3187 | BILLS NOT PAID WHEN DUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. P. O.Box 2019. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. Yo 0 Ly. CLARKS “O.N. T.” SPOOL COTTON. IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID. DEDUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT. AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILE. ee elas LBs. CUBIC FEET. NOs. i ey CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 30% ANQ DECEMBER 3187 BILLS NOT PAID WHEN DUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. 4 WEORDWFANG, mn hi ey 6 — Mie P. O.Box 28919. TERMS NET CASH,!IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. { yvo| Ag. CLARKS “O.N.T.” SPOOL COTTON. 7. + | IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, —r———BEBUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. DECE PER CASES. PKGES. LBs. CUBIC FEET. NOg. ™ A ert CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 3 BILLS NOT PAID WHEN DUE’ SUBJECT TO DRAFT! Cte ae a _ 4 BRO SBPIENG, oe OF.. Le CL Ue FS P. O.Box 2019. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. - P-4f Ley. CLARKS ‘o.N. Tk.” SPOOL COTTON. |“ v | ZO 7 . (a ae - 4 H FE ot Ve | " JO aia CES IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, DEDUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT CASES. PKGES. LBS. CUBIC FEET. NO$. APPROVED CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE 39 AND Dece BILLS NOT PAID WHEN OUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. P. O.Box 2919. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. Ley. CLARKS “O.N. T.” SPOOL COTTON. | 4+ 2S 2 O rw » LID é c. 7d i - IF FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, DEDUCT AMOUNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. PER CASES. PKGES. LBs. CUBIC FEET. Nob. > APPROVE CLAIMS FOR FREIGHT & BONUS SETTLED JUNE hi AND DECEMBER 3147 BILLS NOT PAID WHEN DUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. ie 2 ied o> o> DEY! " ae ee ee eae a eel (Ofl. pele CL ae: e< P. O.Box 28919. TERMS NET CASH,IN NEW YORK BANKABLE FUNDS WITHIN SIX MONTHS. INTEREST ON ANTICIPATED PAYMENTS ALLOWED AT THE RATE OF EIGHT PER CENT PER ANNUM. Ly. CLARES “OLN. T.” SPOOL COTTON. Nil gS “75 at One po? |e mee eee Cf FREIGHT CHARGES ON THIS SHIPMENT HAVE NOT BEEN PREPAID, Lt ee peoycr auOuNT PAID AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT, AND SEND US RECEIPTED FREIGHT BILL. incense : PER CASES. PKGES. Les. Cugic FEeRT. nad : | — aK : “rene CLAIMS FOR FREIG BONUS WeTTRED June 3m A eerenacd 38 No BILLS NOT WHEN DUE SUBJECT TO DRAFT. nin . tt Mb GO” aed Plate | f WA ! 0 LV beter ede Ctl ' . . . SSS re AS VE ~ Ae MN. CL cx Deo Lhe My. SF Fak Soene (prec) Stree Tha. a iL tL, ol . SSS = Bcr>~"»n.-7-2.2[2=E=Tla=_992— Eo=uo“"n==”xr..S en — SS 7 > WA e A pose a éy, ¢ 2, oe ee Sy = Beeor oe oe ey aS SLAG CE OO te ER Sit oye IF THIS BILL IS NOT IN ALL RESPECTS CORRECT, PLEAS Insurance will be effected only upon WRT TEN Se ORE ie “+7>-MANUFACTURERS OF Fa Ah Carlos NEGLIGEE @ SHIRTS, interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum only for unexpired time. Nos. 21 & a WHITE STREET. \ 45 | , ts 72 a A JE ése LEGS a7 av b Jove pees fe Gre ae pee ZL. Ge * VET ao0Ff joer S2 Ze Ze os ahs tig + COaeeck L5G 7S EI9S. fod A ioe a ene a Sahn tat ET one Co ae Fak AL 26 Sa oo - Beat Aan 2 io , a tert oe ; k Tt pg ape ab ee we et I nt ie eee ae 7 hE DHE blake be Te Bev /bS Merk cto V/ | bf e . Oo ’ , q . ° 7 4, ne a ee eee rs Lilaec a a EE a7, tent fh O fie Ha flew =f upon. whveck [Eis ce Zo = , ME Pree ces | ; oo : ax clCeed Hap 4 - Qrrcaes one Pg OF Ocee.. sts i » te. Cbcten tk Med G€ervegeceted Ah |A+4: Ae een liy GG J C290. Kecd afllewinake | ak Ly : Hd Cok Loa loTod Zaengnmsok co Wee wet hele pew, he Qik S (Cnt hafth. Bot ees Avie 4 a baa by la mw oetay G LEI6 17 et fetewal rent Ln po Be freien reg nwoler I Lrert: UT AkKeke L684 - Ce prec / 30. SS- Gy: had. Je 226-38 be he. (foe roe Howe. tle, UK Waa > /V6. hee Neopia LW FSU y Ai Cuee Wh 27a ae Situ ANI ly AMM Ser dled Mefh be Bad tes fa, fo he at et, Let ey oc Po fe Y i ats } , | aeclianis fie i ee fo Piha on ’ State of North Carolina. Superior Court. Iredell County. | June Term 1896, B. FP. Long Assignee. Plaintiff. Against . The Merchants and Farmers National Bank of Charlotte. NWN. ¢C. Defendant, Order. In thie case it is ordered by the Court, by the consent of parties, that tis action be referred to 2. fi Klutts Esqr, for abitrament ont..6 ard and that his award be made a rule of Court. 14 i Judge Superior Court. ( 4" State of North Carolina. $redell County. Superior Court. June Term 1896. Benjamin Long , Assignee of Wallace Brothers. : Plaintiff. jeainat The Merchants and Farmers National Bank of Charlotte. N. C. | Defendant. ’ The defendant answers the complaint of the plaintiff and says: 1; It admits the truth of the allegations contained in the first and second paragraphs of the Complaint. It further alleges that under the deed of assignment made to the plaintiff by the saift firm of Wallace and Brothers, the plaintiff was expressly authorized and empowered to make such settlement and adjustment with any of the creditors of the said firm as in his opinion and judgmert would inf@re to the benefit of the Trust committed to his care. 1l. Answering the allegations contained in the third paragraph of the Complaint this defendant admits that the firm of Wallace Brothers __ et 6for many years kept their account with the defendant, and that the said firm would endorse it commercial paper in its firm- name and that the defendant would discount the same , and place the proceeds thereof to the credit of said firm of Wallace Brothers, on its books whickthen became thmaxxxsubject to the checks of the firm and the notes so discounted became the property of the defendant in the due and usual course of business. That it is true that at or about the time mentioned in the complaint the firm of Wallace Brothers assigned to and hypothecated with the = defendant fifty five shares of the capital stock of the Statesville Developement Company, That it is not true as alleged what the said shares were hypothecated with this defendant to secure said Bank, thee defendant herein, in any overdrafts of the said firm, “but” the said shares of stock were hypothecated with the defendant as security for © the payment of any and all indebtedness of the said firm to the 4 4, defendant , either as principal or as surety , which was then owing and due or te become due, or which might thereafter be contracted. _ lll Answering the allegations contained in the fourth paragraph of the complaint defendant says that prior to the date of the said as- signment to the plaintiff, the defendant held threexmmad notes , all of which weee endorsed by the firm of Wallace Brothers, and assigned to and discounted by the defendant, for value before maturity, with- out notice of any defences against them, said notes having been made by W. R. Sloan , H. Scott and Hoffman Brothers, aggregating the sum8 of six thousand two hundred and fifty dollars , all of which said notes were made payable to Wa'!ace Brot vers, and endorsed by the said Wallace Brothers , and discounted by thi defendant for value before the maturity thereof, without notice of any defences thereto. That before the assignment to the plaintiff the said firm of Wal- lace Brothers brought their promisory note under their firm name , in the sum of fxfkx sixty five hundred dollars , to the defendant, secured by the hypothecation of fifty other G@hares of the stock in the Statesville developement Company, and desired the defendant to discount it , upon the faith of the said shares , and desired the de- fendant to surrendeff to the said firm the three notes endorsed by them as surety , and made to them by the said Sloan, Scott and Hoff- man Brothers, as aforesaid. That the defendant declined to do this, at the time, but held on to the said notes offered for discount, as well as to the shares of stock under the direction of the said firm. neither did it at that time deliver to the said firm the said notes so called for, but retained them also, as-witt-be more fully explain Further answe), the said paragraph defendant, says that at the date of the assignment to the plaintiff the defendant was the owner and hol- der of each and every of the other notes mentioned in said paragraph, a schedule of which is set out in said paragraph, aggregating $ 2812.2 @ach of which notes had been discounted bt the defendant in the due course of business , and the proceeds placed to the credit of the firm of Wallace Brothers, the said notes having been duly endorsed by them before maturity for value, without any notice of any defences V against them or any of them. J&et fiero after t® az. OF UVB e 4" defendant was informed that the makers claimed that the said nétes set forth in the schedule and aggregating the sum of $2812.24, were delivered to the said Wallace Brothers to take up certain other notes , but that this had not been done, but that the said notes had been regularly dis- counted by the defendant for the benefit of Wallace Brothers. This defendant claims and avers that it is the owmer and holder of the said notes for value , having discounteed the same for value before ma- turity , without notice of any defences against them or any of them. | Purther answering the allegations in said paragraph contained defendah defendant denies that the plaintiff is gentitled to demand or receive from this defendant any of the notes set forth in said paragraph. lv. Answering the allegations contained in the fifth paragraph of the Complaint defendant says that prior to the assignment of the firm of Wallace Brothers , it is true that the said firm sent to the defendant certain other notes in renewal of the notes set forth in said paragraph That this defendant did not accept the notes go sent to it in renewal, but retained the same for a while, Purther answering it denies every other allegation contained in said pare agraph, not herein answered. v. Answering the ak& allegations contained in the sixth paragraph of the complaint defendant says that it is true that at the time set forth in the complaint the firm of Wallace Brothers had on deposit with the defendant Bank the sum set out in the Complaint, and it is also true that before the said assignment that the said firm had deposited with the defendant for collection, certain papers in the sum of $330.00 which papers were collected after the assignment . That at the time of the said assignment the said firm of Wallace Brothers was largely ine debted to defendant for money obtained and evidenced by a large number 6 of notes discounteed for the said firm » Upon which the said firm was lia ble as endorser, which said indebted ness was largely in excess of the aggregate amount of said deposit and colledtion, and defendant insiste and alleges that it is in laws entitled to retain the amount of said depot a né collection and apply the same on such indebtedness? Purther answering the complaint of the Plaintiff this defendant, 1 that at the time of the said assignment of the firm of Wallace Brothes to the plaintiff the said finwas largely indebted to this defendant in the sum of many thousand dollars , which indebtedness was evidenced by sundry customers notes made by various and sundry persogs to the said firm and endorsed by the said firm and discounted by the defendant for said firm in the due course of business, for value before maturity, without notice of ant defences or equities against the said act¥ee or any of them, That the defendant for a number of year@ prior to the said aonigeeete kept the account of the said firm and the said firm transe | ected ite anking business with the defendant. That after the assignment i was made the defendant as-certained that certain notes that had been dis- cou nted by it for the said firm would be contested by the makers thereof: in that certain payment s had been made by the makers thereof to Wallace Brothers which payment s had not been made of the said notes to the de- fendant, but that the said Wallace Brothers had given the persons making the said payment s credit therefo@ on the books of the said firs. That also certain other notes had been discounted by the defendant which were indorsed by the firm of Wallace Brothers , and which were claimed by | the makers to have been given to the said firm for the purpose of taking up other notes in the possession of the defendant, but which in truth and in fact were discounted by the defendant. That prior to the assignment the said Wallace Brothers sent to the defendant certain notes for the purpose of being discounted by the defendant and request- ed the defendant to retu rn to them the notes » @ schedule of which is set out in the Sth paragraph of the Complaint, That the notes so sent by the said firm amounted to the sun of fifteen hundred and fifty two 82/100 dollars, That the defendant would not agree to do thi@ but held p to the notes that had been discounted by it, and also held possession of the other notes under the instructions of the said firm, That afterwards the said firm contended that the defendant had accepted & said notes so sent in renewal of the notes set out in the schedule in the Sth paragraph of the complaint, 11. That some two years before the assignment the defendant called upon the said firm of Wallace Brothers to reduce the debt which the said firm then owen it . That the said firm failed to ao 80, but in order to give @ curity for its payment deposited and hypothecated with the defendant fits five shares of stock in the Statesville developement Company, the same being the shates of stock referred to in the thisd paragraph of the com- plaint. That the said shares were hypothecated with the defendant by the said firm as collateral security for the payment of any debs then owing by the said firm of Wallace Brothers whether due or to become due ow which might thereafter be contracted, and not as collateral security, merely, to cover ang over-draft as alleged in the complaint. 111, That a few days before the said assignment the said firm brought to the defendant ita promisory note in the sum of sixty five hundred dol- lars and desired to have the said note discounted by the defendant, and offered to hypothecate with the defendant fifty other shares of the stock in the Statesville Developement Company and desired the defendang to apply the proceeds of such discount to the payment of said notes of W. R Sloan, H. Scott and Hof- fman Brothers, herein before mentioned in this answer. That this the defendant refused to do . That afterwards the said firm contended that this was agreed to be done . That the said firm left the said note and stock with the defendant sub- ject to their order, 1V. That after the assignment of the said firm and the acceotance of the Trust by the plaintiff the plaintiff made demand on the defendant , substantially as set forth in the complaint , for an adjustment of the matters and things growing out of the dealings between the said firm of Wallace Brothers and this defendant ,. North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County. September Srd.1896, . y B.P. Long Assignee of Wallace Walrsral/ The Merchants and Farmers, Bank Award of Arbitrator. acer” ees Cage RI, a, Neel ily lof Charlotte,N.C. This cause having been at May Term 1896,of Iredell Superior Court referred to the undersigned as arbi- trator and after considering the evid@mes adduced and the cont- : pntions of both plaintiff and defendant,de hereby mmc tp Low! ing as my award of all matters in dispute between the plaintiff and defendant in this action that is té say:- | The Merchants and Parmers National prank of Charlotte ,N. C.out t the choses in action desposited with it by Wallace Bros.before | their said assignment to B.P.Long shabe+returh to cai dgholl ,Assig- re the following duplicate notes, vigae- I note on W.P.Absher for )---------+----$ 1635.75, ° _ on -¢ v3 eVhagwehh- 130.55, © an J.Gel theac asso ue--~ 2 -----= 145.40, . onJ.R.@aither-----------<-.------- 228.28, on W.H.Hamilton- 143.40, on ° 156.60, on W.W.Horn, 5355.14, on W.B.McCall 293.05? Total, ee ee ee ae ee eo al a $- 5 r) e That said Bank is to return to said B.F.Long,Assignee the fol-' lbwing renewal notes,viz. Qa, Note on Bailey Bros.April 22,90 days. § 499.40, e * On J.C.Brown March I9. 298.65. ° on W.3.Bryan May Ist. 715.73, ©. on R.M.Jones April 30th.. 260.18, on J.¥. Taylor May 7th. 159.90, on Doma Bros. May 2nd. 201.9 5, on " MayI2th. 446.30, on G@tY¥UEnniss June I2th. f 2350.13? | Said Bank shall return to B.FP.LongAssignee the accommodation | notes endorsed by Wallace Bros. of W.RK.Sloan,H.Seott And Huffman | ‘Bros. amounting to $ 6250.00, The said Bank shall credit on the notes now in its possesion { ‘deposited by Wallace Bros. before said assignment,credits aggrga- ting the sum of $4863.82.according to the following itemized state- ‘ment towit:- | Absher and Dancys note $ 160.06, Absher VW.M. 1220.85, Adams R.C. 21.81, Barnes J.C. 510.80, Bailey Bros. 1. 1B, Bunch and Bro@J.E.) 40.00, Bright A.L.& Co. 22.05, Combs Jas. 155.75, Davis D.R. 58.02, Davis D.V.& E.J. 173.35, Ellis T.J. 98.00, Forrester W.L. 53.00? Giles A H. 89,97,. Hedrick B.A.Mrs. 130.355, Horn W W.' 164.86, #5, Holland J.W.&.Co. Jones R.M. Jones H.M.& M. Kirksey E.J. Lomax P.A. Moose J.A.&.Co. Moose @.D/ Mathes B. McLean J.F. Marlow.J.L. Miller & Stewart. Payne C.C. Rust J.R.Jr. Bhull J.c. Seals T.A. Taylor J.¥. Trausau C.M. Veinener L.A. Williams 0.G.& M.S. Wilkerson J.H. Walker W.T. Weisener D.C. Williams J.R.Jr. That B.P.Long Assignee of Wallace Bros.shall recover of the de- wariaeua? | fentants the Merchants and Farmers,Bank of Charlotte,N.C. the sum of $350.00 ,being a part of the funds collected b;:y said Bank at te | eine of the assignment. That the defendant the Merchants and Parmers National Bank of i charlotte N.C.shall retain $402.40, out of the funds collected by ‘it at the time of the assignment, | That the said Bank shall retain as its absolite propertythe “stock of the Statesville Developement Co.depesited with said Bank and conveyed to the same by Wallace Bros.before said assignment-| \said stock being the par value of $10500.00,estimate value being That the said Bank is entitled to the dividends on said stock \now due,amounting to $262.50. | That said Bank shall prove against the said B.?.Long as Assig= ineeoft Wallace Bros.and prorate on the same,the sum of $4863.82. #4, That said B.?.Long Assignee shall return to said Bank the fol-. | lowing notes,which notes had been desposited by Wakllace Bros.with. | saic Bank before said assignment,but which under an error had bebn | given up by said Bank to said Trustee amounting to $1552.94, (less ° ! and collected by said Long$694.75,and less the Peilman notes which | were compromised by said Long.To wit.: 9,08 W.H.Hamilton less credit of $89.32, § 159.01, W.H.Hamilton, 236.96, J.F.Dellinger(less credit of $50.00, 292.90, That said Bank shall retain as its absolute property the notes | executed by Wallace Bros.to said Bank amounting to $6500.00,which | is to be declared a valid and subsisting debt against said firm of | Wallace Bros. | | That the said Bank shall prove against B.F.tong Assignee of — | Wallace Bros.the said above note $6500.00,and the sundry credits represented by the amount of $4863.82. and set forth in the ninth paragraph in this my award. That the costs of this action shall be divided equally between the plaintiff and defendant and shall be so fail dy them, Respectfully submitted, ee Ft ILL Arbitrator. North Carolina Superior Court. Iredell County, At Chambers in | Lexington,N.C.Sept. B.F. Long Assignee of Wallace | Bros. VS, Judgment. The Merchants and Farmers ‘National Bank ofCharlotte,N.C. This cause coming on to be heard at Chambers before ‘His Honor Greene Judge,by consent of all parties,upon the award \nerein by Theo.F.Kluttz,Arbitrator,by virtue of an order made in: ithis cause at May Term 1896 of Iredell Superior Court-and being heard ,it is considere d and adjudged that said award be and is ‘hereby in all respects dont ined ,amd that the Clerk ofthis Court i} jwill spread said award and this Judgment upon the minutes of this \ jCourt, Judgment is hereby _- against the plaintiffs for-one half | of the costs,and against the defendant for the other half:said loses to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. (tk Cra Ley afl o- xe Coe le fe | OLLALE "Ds he Bi “7 Gow, Judge Presiding. eto r0Olsaquse aotforsw) f&ea0% mk av adimuastd 3A yini0d {Level i &l eosi {BW Yc ainyleal B1emisT ons ectnsnoreM eAT oO. fF, estolisioto Ans& Csanolts" OE LOGO GLO LO my Oe, le, i, ply BICTSsc |aevsacdmsedod °: Hd of mo .ntnoo: senso eit io smeanoo {UBT I LM her a Lite Bo PORTEREROTHERS & CO, Br. TERMS CASH. 78 & 80 WORTH STREET. SETTLEMENTS MONTHLY.—No allowance for exchange. fF aun AKAag ? to Mase. pT : | ¢ ae Z Ir V fae One Pa eae : 4 cle S Ee bape SE B34 peks oa D ae: a fbf of ™ name State ef itiened > and eck 7 oem woew ~— — wr ome oper we wer. ene - Ky 1 William Wallace were upen said hereinafter dates engaged in the whele-sale merehanadise business in the City ef Sta esville, N.C. mmnéer the firm name ana style ef Wallace pnres, lil---- Taat the aefendants wrile se engaged purchased from the plai atiffs large quantities ef geeds and merehaneise, frem the R2md day ef May 1895 te the Sth day ef Aug 1895, ameunting te the sum of $ 444.42 \ IV---- That the defneants have failed te pay fer the same and the aforesaid swm ef $ 444.42 is still due ana unpaia, together with interest thaveva. phat defendants ave ne Counter-elaim er atts. ay eff against these plaintiffs ete ‘ gi es Nerth Carelina Im the Superier Ceurt Iredell County Febery Term [896 T.W.Perter, N.T.Perter, Ad ate de J.L.Perter A.C.sehreeder,E.E.Weisketten,, trading under the firm name and style ef Perter Bres & Ce vs Davia Wallace, Isaae Wallace, William Wallaee, trading under the firm name ef Wallace Bres, ana Davie Wallace Isaae Wallace, william Wailace inaividually. The plaintiffs complain ana say; I------ That they are a firm ageing business unaer the firm name anéd style ef Perter Bres @ Ce im the City ef New Yerk ana State of New Yerk and werp such en the dates knereinafter te be mentioned II------ That the aefenaants pavia Wallace, y;saae Wallace ané William Wallace were upen said hereinafter dates engaged in the whele-sale merehanédise business in the City ef Sta esville, N.C. unéer the firm name ané@ style ef Wallace pres, Ili---- That the aefendants while se engaged purchased from the plaiatiffs large quantities ef geeds and merehandise, from the 22ma day eof May 1895 te the Sth day of Aug 1895, amounting te the sum of $ 444.42 IV---- That the defneants have failed te pay fer the same ané the aferesaiad sum ef $ 444.42 is still due ana unpaia, tegethker with interest thereen. gkat defendants have neo Counter-claim er sete ss ae ft eff against these plaintiffs wit A ceopy ef saia purehnases is herete attachea and asked te be made a part ef this Complaint Waerefere plaintiffs demand juagment agagmst the defendant firm Wallace Bres and against pavie Wallace, Isaae Wallaee and William Wallaee individwally, fer the sum ef $ 444.42 ana inter- est en the same till paia. II--- Fer eest ef aetien te be taxea by the Clerk. III---- Fer swek ether ane furtmer releif as may be just ana right. : LL Calblduc&é. Plaintiff fs atty J ene ef the members ef the firm ef Perter pres makes eathk that the facets set ferth in the feregeing Compaaint are true as ef mis ewn knewleage, except taese matters statea upem infermatien ana beleif, ane he Swern te ana subseribea 4 befere me this Peay ef Ul Mice Jit 8a Tse gnJ SH Zags eaeal ,soulia JSaes Leh Ww Cov ilina A/G Zl Bret Prdece Ort ) May, 2/676 ML, Perl AY Cos lag sh at Jp aDeus av Rawls [P20 9S AI j Vat pyattace, Jzgaac Vi wth << Ag a I OC Cnt me OC cprrme ona Corn Ge Fo |74© Bib cee Lt. —4 Ae, an Stat GF —* tars apr Aa en 5G D-Ganreh H fe pe. Nerth Carelina | in the ,uperier Court ‘Iredell Ceunty Febry Term 1896 Tae River-side Cetten Mills Vs ‘Davia Wallace, Isaac Wallace and William Wallace, trading and doing businessunder the firm name andstgle ef Wallace Bres, and David Wallace , jsaae Wallace and william Wallace individually. The plaintiff cemplains ane says; I---- That it is a Cerperatien duly erganized by ame under tke laws ef the State ef Virginia, ane has its place ef susiness in “the City ef Danville, im saié@ State. II---~- Taat the defendants David wallace, ,saae Wallaew ané William Wallace, at the time hereinafter mentioned, were en- e2gea in the whele-sale merchanaise business im the City ef _tates ville, N.C. wumaer the firm name ef Wallace res. Ill---- That during the menth ef Aug 1895 nnt—o+—stner—pines Withim the past year the saia firm puréhasee geeas ma merehan- disse from the pkeinditts. by aceeunt, amevating te the sum of $723.98, wkieh will fully appear by retevente te the saié aeceunt whieh is herete attached and asked to be mace a part ef this com pliaint, Iv----- That ne part ef said sum has been paia, put the entire amewR| ef $723.98 isstill due ane ewing plaintiffs my defendants. ana defendants have ne valid counter-claims er sets off against saig sum | | \ ad 1 ae - Wherefere plaintiff demands judgment, Fer the sum ef $723.98, the purchase price ef saia geoas with intezvest eon the same from tae I2th aay of Aug 1895 till paia. II---- Fer eest ef action te be taxee by tae Clerk ef this court III---- Fer sven etner ana furtaer releif as may be just me right. . BLO iecLe. | Atty fer Plaintiff > . 2 KY; -~—.. =, x i Opes ALA ACG geet mé Treas ef tae plaintiff makes @ath that the fac ts set ferth in the foregoing complaint are true as ef his own knowledge, except these matters statea upon infermatien and bpeleif, ana these ne beleives te be true. Swern te an@ subseribed before HK She: , oo . . t 2 wy gf day ef Larry 1896 | 5 Fis ae / ; } _—— PALE / CZ “iki : 7 (Ge t * ites gerl senguca Te iiele- arele: see . m™ Ia ae Vets my *, . ow » if ~ SeABw olla oe Bey Pode ooo: Qa lLegeret aa. Oa 82 @ aration @aen} J (8 RZec iva ta y Vin iad eas: Werte etme - ? J ao Tl. ee \- « a otsa aeacco2ata Onk @2 atewe, ‘ $s . * BBN KT ale Prdea ay i | re, Ma cas. Saaace Chetan (Wo ntince 7 nas 5 Ps | Pratl ace Oars A CF PSH AS 4A affroers het Qtw Anvjwwy,T- hex Ma ns hoe fi 2S, | P24 e. thw he Oi ee ek A | cy SY EI PRS (eT NE" BR ae =f (Cv dria, * ha oe ee Cree ane, fe Ag Tee pg i Tin glare P45 L287: vp Nerth Carelina In the Superior Ceurt Iredell County Febry Term 1896 Tae Saehs Shee Manufacturing Co Vs Davie Wallace, Isaae Wallace William Wallase, trading uneer the firm name and style ef Wallaee Bres, an@ pavia Wallace Vv Isaae Wallace ana William Wallace, indiviewally. The plaintiff smnitid ane says; I---- That Tre Sachs Shoe Manufacturing Ce is a cerperatieon duly autkerized by ane uneer the laws ef tre State ef Onie, ane as such has its place ef susiness in the City ef Sineinnati, Ohie IIl---- That the defendants, Davie Wallaee, Isaae Wallace ana William Wallace were at tae time ane Place hereinafter mentienead engaged in the whelesgle merehandise business in the City ef + Statesville, N.C. under the firm name ane style ef Wallace Bres III---- Taat em the Ist aay ef July 1895 the aefneants became ana were indssted te the plaintiff, as evidenced by the fellewing bend er nete, in weras and figures te-wit; $643.97 Statesville, N.C. July Ist 1895 Sixty days after agate we premise te pay te the erder ef Tae Saehs Shee Manfg Company, Six Hundred and Ferty three97/100 | Dellars piiians detaeatioa: Value reseived, payable at eur effiee 155 Stewart Blag, 280 Breaaway New Yerk. * Ne , Due Aug 30. Wallace Bres Taat me part ef said mote has ever been paid, but the entire sum as above set ferth is @ue ana ewing , tegether with inter- est thereon till paiéa. III---- That en the I0th aay eof Julp 1895 the aefenaants purehas ea from tke padintiff geeas ane merechanaise, not ineluded in the nete aferesaid, but in @pen account, te the sum ef § 129. 60, all ef waieh sum is due ana unpaid Wherefere plaintiff aemends judgment; I--- Fer the sum ef $773.57, the ameunt @ue en said nete andepen aeceunt, tegether with interest en $643.97 frem the Ist aay ef Sept 1895 till paia,ane interest en the sum ef $129.60 frem July TOth 1895 till paia. II---- Fer eest ef aetien te be taxee by the Clerk ana fer such ether ana further releif as may be just ane right. ol! i Lal Lert Ce : Atty fer Pla ntiff Si (3 S hr edi J Aw Sata Sha Orirurt Che makes eath that the’ faets set ferth in the feregeing complaint are trve as ef his ewn knewleage except these stated upen i nfermatien ane seleif ane these he bele ives te be true. Kx ef aN Swern te ana subseribed before me this / © day Of Sock Shc tidy 6 f ihe AG eee Cor F fc, Lum (FICE Wf Sack OA. Luke As (Pac lpothac., Jaaac Pootea a WK Cn, TL ec pC = ZZ es po og ag r goo YY an ek pr ee Ce Vv eee ween — ee ae Ou Sy rar Her HG Ley Yee fan foe (& ALLERIA Zafer L, SOS ds To oe Fe Fan) » Loin Prise oo See, aos at fr> sched he Ie. Fifictionss C25 a. a teeed Calaut ow, Ge gel dow Aarcy a Wh hn a Parco _ UD, aie fe ig ele y eT. oe y, bali spobisrncds Hey ees ante Ge. Bi Hoa. fig ae acek>d 7 APY L PES Katvay Gruteruy ak fi.akinond Va, oct pberacse ly Amat eed : 3 Be Ocreee che profil . od a ek an pokey a id la AMA jc SL clay a (Jecesl fect Me cal lta $| Kehna ZIM ch oory of Olek 1198- sha / fara | Oceceed Q + (Leet vee a fle Ceeeced Oy cveceh (Paths Megs t, 7 ding Addigmec ; DPartuoe lorpchar | betiuy Aryrrw Wage he PDriadlei Cae hs fut: haldoee tellers bgcbains Blhactenl gfe, ga r for mutins (PL, f | ok vz Spl 4 a ai Mnf ee eal - / PrP ot oo Chey. i ACEI . CSercc Loe ti / 7 i : Lt f . ; me APY C ye Atfiue have A Cetecit hirig Ce ~ 4 44 C a i. Z ey : Y Up, Ce Cros ok js pe aag = : CA wich Kicsied ts -Q4: = + a fe 4) J Ys ny a (2; 7 4 . 4 . 7 “T- frhn Ofte Wee et r 0 / f. J YJ ‘ f7 - = —— 47 2 g ; Zo Came/ cy ay | herp ae . NAV TPP 7 D EGS dep | he Len ele | MYM Fe +P pre He Bory LP CexK P pP f-- VIRGINIA: IN THE AW AND EQUITY COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND the 14th day of December, 1395. ROBERT F. WDLLIAMS COMPANY, ( a corporation doing business and duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Virginia Gor Vs Ln—-Eqity TSAAC WALLACE, WM. WALLACE, AND DAVID WALLACE, partners doing vusiness under the firm name and stvle of WAT.LACE BROS, and the SOUTHERN RATLWAY COMPANY, OTe gn ) ( ) ( | ae ) ( ) ( ) BDE~O-FR-B-E This cause, in which the plaintiff has proceeded in the mode prescribed hy law against the non-resident defend- ants, came on this day to be heard on the bill which, upon motion of the plaintiff, is taken for confessed and upon an attachment vroperly granted to secure und errors the claim of the plaintiff and the return of the sheriff .there- on and on the deposition of T.l..Stone, and exhidits filed therewith, including a deed of assignment dated September 14, 1895, from Isadore, David and William Wallace, partners doing business as Wallace brothers fand their wives, and was On consideration whereof it appears to the court to be proved that the defendants Wallace Brothers are non-res- idents and were on September 14,1895 and so continued,and are indebted to the said Robert F.Williams Company in the sum of $442.73 with interest on $66.60 part thereof from the 30th day ‘ ofAugust 1895,and on the sum of $144.28 part thereof from the llth day of September 1895, and on the sum of $14.27 part thereof from the 16th day of September 1895, and on r ‘ te the sum of $70.80 part thereof from the 2lst day of Septmm- @ si aah all Yat RuUed OY COUNGGL « «ee i The cememincn aa Sse or ber 1895, and on the sum of $66.80 part thereof from the 8th day of October 1895, and on the. sum of $16.09 part thereof from the 20th day of September: 1895,and.on the sum ‘of $63.88 part thereof from the 29th day of September 1895 until paid; that the nun-resident defendants, Wallace Broth- ers did, on the 14th dav of September 1395 execute to. B.F. Long as trustee a deed of trust conveying certain real and personal property for the benefit of their creditors, which deed was duly acknowledged and registered in the Superior Court of Iredell county, North Carolina, on the same day; that among the property of tne said Wallace Brothers was fourteen bags of coffee; that the said bags of coffee were never in the State of North Carclina, nor were they ever in the possession of the assignee, B.F.Long, but were at the time of making said deed and continued to be in the State of Virginia, and were about to be removed from said State when attached; that said dedd of September 14, 1895, from Wallace Brothers to B. F. Long has never been recorded in the state of Virginia nor in the Chan- cery Court of the City of Richmond, as required wy the laws of this state. And it further appearing that at the time of fil - ing, the said bill the said plaintiff, Robert F. Williams Company, was a corporation duly incorporated and doing business under the laws of the state of Virginia, and that satd plaintiff ecorporation sued out and had executed on . the 17th day of September 1895 an attachment on the said fourteen bags of coffee,then in the city of Richmond; that after the institution of this suit and the levying of said attachment, the said trustee, B. F. Long, did institute suit on October 28, 1895, against the said Robert F. Wil- liams Company in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, for the wrongagonversion of said bugs of cof- fee, as appears from the order of publication, published in the "Landmark", a newspaper published wt Statesville , North Carolina, which paper and order of publication have been filed as an‘exhibit with the deposition of T. L. Stone, yet neither the said a:isignee, B. F. Long, nor Wallace Brothers have appeared in this suit or made any defence therein. Tt is therefore adjudged, ordered and decreed that the said plaintiff recover .of the said Wallace Brothers, defendants, the sum of $442.73, with interest on the sever- al items constituting said sum as above set forth and its court costs and the costs of this attachment; that the lien of said attachment is superior to any claim that said trustee may have had to said property under saia deed of assignment, dated September 14, 1895, and said bags of coffee are liable for the payment of the plaintiff's debt. And the Court having directed before the entering of this decree that the plaintiff give bond, and sufficient surety in the penalty of $500.00, with con- dition to perform such future order as may be made upon the appearance of said defendants and their making de- fense,and said bond having been duly executed as required. Votes j Tt is adjudged, ordered and decreed that J. T. Hughes, sheriff of the city‘of Richmond do, in due form of law, sell the fourteen bags of coffee and the. proceeds of said sale, after the payment of the custs of . \ keeping, the property and of the sale thereof, and the court costs and the costs of this attachment, shall be applied by him in satisfaction of this decree. STATE OF VIRGINIA: CITY OF RICHMOND, to-wit: T, P.P.WINSTON, Clerk of the Law and EByuity Court of the City of Ricnmond in the State of Virginia, do herevy certify that the foregoing and annexed is a true copy of the DECREE entered in the foregoing cause. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of ‘he said Court at ‘he Courtroom this iL - day of porn. aye 1896 and in the 120th year of the Commonwealth. Cou = (2. A LAW AND EQUITY COURT | STATE OF VIRGINIA | CITY OF RICHMOND’ to wit: I, EDMUND C. MINOR, only Judge of the Law and Equity Court of the City of Richmond, in the State of Virginia, do hereby certify that P.P.WINSTON, whose gen- uine signature is subscribed to the foregoing certificate, was at the time of shgning and attesting the same, the Clerk of the said Court, and that his said attestation is in due form. Given under my hand and seal this 2 = day a8 [ene 1894 Se, LE In oman, ps STATE OF VIRGINIA : CITY OF RICHMOND to wit: I, P.P.WINSTON, Clerk ofthe Law and Equity Court of the City of Richmond, in the State of Virginia, do hereby certify that the Honorable Edmund C. Minor, whose genuine signature is subscribed to the annexed and foregoing certificate, was at the time of signing the same the only Judge of the said Court. x Given under my hand this 2 day at fare 1894 ROBERT F. WILLIAMS: -CO. ) V8). ) DECREE 7 WALLACE BROS . ol silence atianee oc iaiapanenians i i CAROLL ri ‘A, | Superior Superior Court, redell odanere Oct. oe, 1895. * . , assignee of Wallace Bros., vs, the $ of B.¥. Wiliams Oo. YY, . g6 of summons aD warrantof 4 ment, f tabove named will take notice Z ‘ale LY. d ot mans on the above entitled action CLF. Ct Cl, ° 9 << @ SEG oF. T Bas defendant on the 28th acne the sum of $300.08 and » re aaeeey eastiee ey cin pogsonal value Bf $200. i ee C ALR. ite desncent al 9 e. of the. a erat Courtot ‘the defend- = Sie es LANDMARK. © léwuccues H, ¥. FUROHES, clerk treat Superior Court. - Furnished Der 29, 1906. ; Lis1n.D WELL & CLARK, Proprietors : Three Massa. -50 eS IsSUED TWice A WEEE-ITVESDAYTS anyD FRIDAYS. - Dak ¢ Fo azote Log 0 bra Brrecnite | Col ost on Application. } bo1SUOd sry, : MIIY wom eu ‘op[tasoude piae M01 = egueTEyUOD petiojeues sem ‘Aj1uT0TA stq3 yea y “YWieqg “q ‘y “sey e104} eoMj0vad ouy e sey oy He ‘aOwuIxerT] Burave! siq 107 2 UIGUI 943 os1N0d Jo iv A0LVIs Veainboe yaenbesqns oq} pu xory Ul 109383 SIq jo zspinm Or1jqud 41eyvm oO} Aj10q1| Te 4ou OUl1} OM0S JO S1Q3 UMOTY seq NVT SHY, “WlOJION 03 caom 0} wuixery jo ‘eukey ‘ty ‘st id Wa rr atest, 4S, fat Go 6g = C. heelin. C Le serene] » THE LANDMARK, ® |pnmeron Furnished One Year, $2.00 Six Months, 1.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, Proprietors on Application. Three Months, .50 ATi Zs Dick 6.7 ISSUED TWiIicE A WHEEE-TVUESDAYS AND FRIDAYS. Ae a ek a See Ls \O4 hittin. Mroipr~ 9 OB eceree Re Bae <3 Af ee y Be aage ,‘ a \ ie Ape Corelivea Luh Corel | F210 fire GE LS FC SUG Mella sees Ctbbigree GAbb Maines Fs — Ly. Lathe C220 pel all | dk Abe tLe oy erec4 Detletcf lar Jo} Yat e° Cif Jaze. Jed: Vine $e | | Meco bk C2ELe Sra | C Ge | wa Ve oyu pees OOS 42e oe ee Cyeo $08 ZL “3 o Eye C22 | @ 93° | ylyy CG EF co D fencer f00 | far FO CLT. aa “4 ews LCG co GYl- | G0. D226 2S 45 eG by 2S aoieas far tcl CLag Slee S858 @ LSS Bao Sassdard Beogare CO Koc | Doe SA AL«AtC face : (fe ! ‘ Cz ee ff % ag el, Cass ale ¢ Blew eal ed fon : (¢ bt L¢- xf Coe SS AE Bf LD kite a Bace ds OLA Late * fait ua TE C 2K 2088 tygocl Cleo ; a ee 4:25 ee (215° : 0" abled poor @ 5 Ky Le thee a 4 pte Quik Ala cle Ce 3b 1 Me date VW | Brea feo a0 Neves @ 3 Mtabhe as Lbeeshe Cif // | LLP fe alle Gloas @ SY wee aie oe iT a ¢ Vy- b Co ale OY Z. Scorer 7c LE BY ! @2 teh bbecl G theo EC/0 Mader ow Gre @2b QO2Y @ Yip : C19 ¢ iy Jp <1 & if Set IIb . CYAK v Ce 2cad sees a4 De : GS 20 iy ae e Cfo a G0 Ly bao OL € mS - > | | far Males Ct Ss Bai, Crochen, € | “ge Co Dessies 7 pies CO § 208 pf C¢ Loaf fered: CP. SA CB ag’ Aeob led @ 34 2 ey C tf 3 / 1 £7 La Blatt C1 Carsiir ¢ SISK Tt —— @Carrfec C2 2 Asay dali — ODYf 7, ee ag @ 1/5 QDs’ ey SK | Py | ppotewe 1 00t EC 40 ee Cxs- ft fe @ ‘/ _gsctets fu e EC 00 bes @ ys habitats (OZ) Sel 4s @ Jo ee, wr Ka gertides db dallor CR . La diy gape basco G17 Eee otal @ SG a sy 7 ae tA ea se BI Lun > by t ‘Beottbes CT lar. tf 22ve C2 EF Ct i4£0 C4 ? 374 Nose ora tetntd Hie © NP gy aaa the? @ 53, @ De (a Ze SS e“a- (2 ayy ‘i : } tL gest dis Comes (A CZ - pose a Laws “3 @ C4 Ge 4 ‘oe ae 21en3 @ Cw jp Bleeds Ot Meer £4 oa feeon epi fips v1 m @/0 Vr / Ot Mantes sees Ch A300 Al0g {8 - GF GO re OQ“. JAN a Bhi 14], er O 45% (O24 Ne 7 DE AF. | ‘7 Whestiins Qy SO Nt x YlEet2te a LBS 29 DQueherg Zs. AO Ver _daleree Oh AY“ Vi Carecbire) O24 a SY aeerceds @ g oe {¢ @ sx | C, CLAeete @yg¢ 2)) La ¢ Ce ‘>, Co ¢- Le apg tle fe acer a z Bok Lae greet 6 Vegan ray ag Bee a Le tLe La C 7 : a | A deke G ont - ae | nn ity bh - ais Pie Main ge pipes tm ne PERE A SS8 oh. 4 i { | . i | ‘ i oe ea A . ; Sg : | Zzce ee pe Te aciy am : fox eget oP t Pace Lz | tet tect cae ees 7 Mak’ Bec. _ Jf : a — | eae GA, | ca pf ican Se m< A RAR Cece <= a arm Yoafes disck. ih hn, tage AE ene eg Mrcetenl tv the Csafelaiak Lr be Z hifec haut. Vp Catt 40 | | cell. yA fas dhe oe a sf 4 Rec -@ he Ripon fs Yell, Molec yE Shue gas Wb Soccer bayo yf Ode ees Zoe | ltottcled -Lrwer / Onepae. fia atlcnage: ELT es 0207 Home «le a Ui eas ace | Gy, 4 of, wc Pew /t7U, / Ctr ae final bec AOL thi bid seats dae L dit fec Gaurd bet ove ust hia O% My a “Lo, “LZ Sex ba Phat Sos Ay Ag, Cel to gig deseitled puspeite eae 7 . Had A brrmgie, G aT td 10.01 Ue Ge oY Bot foe lei pu eed | liu. nr is 13° /F 9-3, DoW LAY 102 f LLL Cranky Le ey ye eae CML Beet . 7 ni sng Berne tgalae, GS i alii armed bum eg oe bi Maco UM bed OArtd eb Ciethant Sarrmtes | L LQAe eae Cred (77007, AGL, AVUS a7 Ge bcluol Ly pites J, eed Ao Cette pte cle Ce Be Addcga- ce OZ Kt» 4 Leaf. y Webel, Lee. oe Wat big ‘nif EGR Li lind ise bacd ntl. aud (P70. geirsees setae: : a en | Cpls’ Awe Viued Hee ane a ‘pliitak Pear pus yo we pp | : 7. i [jel difabeod f : pe 4 y oe i Prot Ep, Get tig core aed UC1e2L Sormue Once A teed WN. (Liayies Ht wrgnal, Ter oo 4 | | Vee ein wundtr hitceiteon oy AM ate: Ys ee | Commrorteaeed on ie ibaddlel a as = (as pp dh aps arbi ee iets paueee Tyee a Ho 2 id — a Pb a a0 ee fu PH ty Lr Hr A uit off. haved gow CLA AAgreired he Cake fo Joke Srintce ihe fteS Ae se JZ COret fa ba Gf ohn ha Gwe hovel | SA 23 Ye Lt Iv — Sf Meee atl, fudcee & Ay buy ITP Gor KE, ti ML) | Mae Occatgr Ves ede, ee Dradatl As oe ee Wt OA Hones . G ste ae | Ly, 4; i hi ee 7 Abell lt duaricbre PA dade grarech cart at 3 oO i Lb DD Gai, fae tha , Dindel (re aa WV j Yfed lt fork LT | Pe et a IR STN . yj =ht $8 pee fe oe eS 7 emee se fy eng? OY oO OT syne poe pear Gof Ph oro ane Ae a ee fren gaa , : Go FT PD pags toe Be pe pe IE Lae a ae a2) } ~~ Pig Saas Ube POV Clad. Hen Ege Bene Gu facia Age ort La Le fowe SF C6ce Wa Cele ee Gi I ge GGL on ne Lgl ga Go Se a Fe Form 15. TREAD THIS CONTRACT .2 - SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY, | B=PRHSS FORWARDERS. ee a ~MOT NEGOTIABLE. | /7 = (DOMESTIC BILL OF LADING.) O75 megs GALES OS) ABS os ' J Y/ he i/ Lf) ae : Sip Z. ed at IER CCA oirc P Claagller 3 any. nae . Ah ae ye amo MC hoC argesAite’ made by said Company, Marked 4 ct, Tg fe: Whic is mutnally/agfeed is to be forwarded to complete ti porta om. tis part of the congi@tration of this contract, and it Company ARE FORWARDERS ONLY, and are not to be held liable or responsible for any Ses or damage to said property wile being veyed by the C to whom the same may be by said Icxprees Company entrusted, or arising from the dangers of Kailroads, Ocean or River Navigation, Steam, Fire in Store, , or ip Transit, Leakage, Breakage. or from any cause what- ever, unless, in every case, the same be proved to have occurred from the fraud or gross nexlige id sess company, or their servants, wnless speciall: insured by it and so specified on this Receipt, which insurance shall constitute the limit of the liability e OUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY in any event; ann if the value of the prcncny above described is not stated by the shipper at the time of shipment and & , led in this receipt, the holder hereof will - mand of the SOUTHERN EXPRi SS COMPANY acum exceeding siy(y Dellars fcr the loss of, or Cemige to the shipment neni receipted for. . vail ts Nor st said Company be held responsible for the safety of saia property after 1:6 arrival at ite place of destination, ar bey And if the same is intrusted or delivered to any other Execs Con.pany ¢r Agent (u hich said scuthern Eaprees Company are hereby anth.crized to co), such Com- pany or person 80 selected shall be rec ard«d cxclusively as the agent of the shipper or carrer, and. as such, alune liable and the Southern «ee Company chall net Le, in any event. ble for the negligence cr ncn-performance of any ‘uch Company 0 yersen ; and the shipper and owner hereby severally agree that all the stipuiations and conditions in this receipt contained, sha)l extend to and enare to the benefit of cach and every Ccmpany or person to whem the southern J'xprees Company may entrust or deliver the above-described property for traneportation, and shall define and limit the liability therefor of such other Cc mpany or person In no event shall the Southern Express Company be liable for any lors or damage, unless the claim therefor ehail be presented to them in writing at this — ee a oe this date, ge sam yr 4 to which this oe oe ees All article of GLASS, or contained in glass. or any of o ereene nature, W en at Shipper's sis y.. an per, agrecs that the Compan not be held responsible for any injury by break: r otherw: nor for damage to goods not properly packed and ec be Ne le day ovee, Oh tobi = foe transportation. It ther agreed, that said Com shall n D Any ev logs, damage, or detention caused by the acts of God, C1 jlitary authority, nsurrecti t, dangers incident to a time po rw agg oe SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY'S MONEY ORDERS. FOR SALE AT ALL THE IMPORTANT ACENCIES OF THE COMPANY. CHEAP, EASY TO OBTAIN, PREFERRED BY MERCHANTS. Good at about 15,000 Places in the United States and Canada. THE SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY WILL ISSUE MONEY ORDERS At all important Agencies, payable at all other of its important Agencies, and at about 13,000 places reached by the other prominent Express Companies in the country, Me OI I 5 5 a pices vcs dno vs a alee ops eee due bei keckek 5 cents Over 85.00, not over $10.00. 2000... ceeeee 8 cents Over $10.00, not over $20.00. 200... oe. cl ccc cece necnee 10 cents Over ssaoe not over eae Wile Gi ndne st regs nnein cavavuuseen 12 cents ‘ ® Over .00, not over MEM nclicicnvens éwvhectcnponet sec iced 15 cents RATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: || Over Sio.00! not over $5000.00 is cents || NO Written application required. Over $50.00, not over $60.00... ook k cence ccc cccccece 20 cents Over $60.00, not over $75.00 25 cents Over $75.00, not over $100.00. 02... i... c ccc cocscccuces 30 cents Over $100.00, at above rates. The attention of the public is called to this important feature of this Company’s business. Apply to Agents of Southern Express Company for Money Orders or information as to same.