HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune_20_2006_Regular_MinutesIREDELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2006
The Iredell County Board of Commissioners met in Regular Session on Tuesday,
June 20, 2006, at 7:00 P.M., in the Iredell County Government Center (Commissioners' Meeting
Room), 200 South Center Street, Statesville, NC.
Present were:
Chairman Sara Haire Tice
Vice Chairman Godfrey Williams
Steve Johnson
Marvin Norman
Ken Robertson
Staff present: Acting County Manager Susan Blumenstein, County Attorney Bill Pope, Code
Enforcement & Planning Director Lynn Niblock, Planning Supervisor Steve Warren, Planner Rebecca
Harper, and Clerk to the Board Jean Moore.
CALL TO ORDER by Chairman Tice.
INVOCATION by Commissioner Johnson.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ADJUSTMENTS OF THE AGENDA: OTION by Chairman Tice to approve the following
agenda adjustments.
Additions: • Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #54 to Appropriate $12,890 in Fund
Balance & to Transfer the Same Amount to the Parks Capital Reserve Fund
• Request from the Register of Deeds for Approval, in Accordance with G.S. 153A-103,
to Hire a Relative
• Announcement of Three Openings for the School Facilities Task Force
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
Chairman Tice declared the meeting to be in a public hearing.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Consideration of a Proposed Amendment to the Iredell County Zoning Ordinance, Article
VII, Section 7.0, Minimum Lot Size: To Increase the Minimum Lot Sizes for the Entire County
with the Exception of the Back Creek and Coddle Creek Water Supply Watersheds: Planning
Supervisor Steve Warren described a map (PowerPoint illustration) containing five color -coded areas
depicting (1) the WS -II Watershed/balance (minimum lot size of 43,560 sq. ft., blue color), (2) the WS -
IV Critical and Protected Area Watersheds (minimum lot size of 40,000 sq. ft., orange color), (3)
municipal ETJ areas (coded with blocked print), (4) the Davidson/Coddle Creek Township remainder
(minimum lot size of 40,000 sq. ft., yellow color) and all other areas of the county (proposed minimum
lot sizes of 30,000 sq. ft., green color). Warren said the proposal was to increase minimum lot sizes of
40,000 sq. ft. in the Catawba/Lake Norman and Lookout Shoals Water Supply Watershed areas and in
the remainder of Davidson and Coddle Creek townships. He said the proposal would also increase the
lot sizes in the remainder of the county up to 30,000 sq. ft. Warren said in the RU -R districts, there was
an increase to 40,000 sq. ft., since the minimum was already 30,000 sq. ft. Additionally, Mr. Warren
said the 43,560 sq. ft. lot sizes in the Coddle Creek/Back Creek Water Supply areas were already being
enforced through the watershed ordinance. He said the changes would not apply to any plats already
reviewed by the staff, any vested rights, or lots "of record." Warren said on June 7, 2006, the planning
board approved the text amendment by a vote of 6-4. He then read the statement of land use plan
consistency both for, and against, the proposal.
Commissioner Johnson complimented the planning department employees for their research and
study on the growth management proposals. He said the staff had the board's full confidence.
Warren expressed thanks to the commissioners and to the planning board. He said the hearings
followed the democratic process, and all public comments were welcomed.
Commissioner Robertson asked how the staff arrived at the boundaries or lines used in the map.
Warren said much of the WS -IV Watershed was in close proximity to Lake Norman, and this
area was already identified. He said the area had high growth (orange color) and much of it wasn't
served by public utilities. Warren said minimum lot sizes were created in conjunction with a nonpublic
utility standpoint. He said the health department had submitted a letter that listed reasons to have an
increase in the minimum lot size. Warren continued by saying neighboring counties
(Catawba/Cabarrus/Gaston) had also increased lot sizes. He said there was a `regional growth engine"
out of Charlotte, and it was especially affecting Davidson and Huntersville. Warren said Troutman was
becoming a popular growth site, too, and the planning staff was trying "to get ahead of the curve" with
the minimum lot sizes. Warren acknowledged that most of the Brawley School Road area had been
developed, but he said there were still a few remaining parcels that could be built out.
Commissioner Williams asked if Cabarrus and Catawba Counties had adopted a countywide
minimum lot size requirement or if their ordinances only applied to watershed areas.
Warren said countywide, but they were based upon certain characteristics (watersheds,
availability of public utilities, etc.) He said the concept of minimum lot sizes was not to increase
sprawl, but to encourage higher -density development in areas of the counties that were typically
serviced by public utilities and had a better grid system of roads. Mr. Warren said citizens in opposition
might speak about city sprawl. He said it was an "inverse" relationship having to deal with areas of the
county where no public utilities existed; however, there was control over land use regulations that
indirectly impacted traffic congestion and school capacity.
Commissioner Williams said the lot size requirements could then be implemented in any
designated area, for example, a high growth area.
Warren said there were certain concepts in watershed ordinances that were intended to protect
the runoff of certain lands that were more suitable for development. He said in some instances, for
example in lakeside developments, there appeared to be too much runoff in the lakes. Warren said the
board had recently approved an erosion control program.
Commissioner Johnson said he understood that if lot sizes were increased, development would
be pushed towards the cities for water sewer.
Warren said the lot size ordinance alone would not accomplish this; however, it was one of
many tools that could be used. He said in the future an overlay ordinance, with input from the public
and real estate community, would be presented.
Commissioner Johnson said the ability to push the growth towards municipalities was limited, if
the towns did not have an outer growth boundary.
Warren said an urban service boundary was helpful in the long-term future of a town's public
utility system. He said these were areas suitable for high density -- not the outlying county areas.
Commissioner Robertson said the board's intent, when growth recommendations were
requested, was to focus on the Brawley School Road and the Perth Road areas, especially the roads that
emptied into Perth. Robertson asked about the map and the orange overlay area extending beyond the
two road areas. He asked Mr. Warren if the staff thought the areas north of I-40 (depicted on the map)
actually needed to be included in the lot size requirement.
Warren said the property was rural and not as much in demand as some areas. He said it could
probably be left out of the area (orange), but it had potential for growth.
Deborah Bowen said (1) she lived on the Brawley peninsula (2) she was a part owner of EFC
Builders, and (3) she was a member of the Lake Norman Homebuilders Association. She asked how
slowing growth fit into the county's comprehensive plan, and she asked the rate of growth the county
was trying to achieve. Bowen said residential/commercial growth was "fluid," and if it were stopped or
2
curtailed on one side, it would pop up elsewhere. She said no growth approaches were responsible for
"leapfrog" development patterns. Mrs. Bowen said the influx of new people would continue, and the
measures being studied would not slow the movement. She said housing prices would increase if fewer
houses were available, and this primarily hurt the service workers. Bowen proposed that a committee
(15 people) be established with representation from the homebuilder's association and other stakeholder
members -- planning staff, schools, fire/police, chambers of commerce, municipalities, and landowners.
She requested that the proposals be remanded to the planning board for further study.
Anna Bonham, an investment broker, and a resident in the Brawley School Road area, said she
wanted to speak in regards to property -owner rights. She said that in speaking with residents in the
area, most everyone said the failure to pian for adequate public facilities was the major problem.
Bonham said, "Let's not make the mistakes of the past, let's do something to fix it."
Brian Robinette, President of the Lake Norman Homebuilders Association said restrictive land -
use policies had been a "disaster" in other areas. He said growth planning forced more and more
families in high-density areas thereby reducing the availability of housing. Robinette said this not only
increased housing prices but also the tax rate. Robinette said smart growth policies led to sprawl, and
this had an impact on land for development. He said lot restrictions would decrease the number of lots
in a development by approximately one-third or even up to fifty percent. Robinette said property
owners holding large tracts, usually farmers, would feel the most negative impact. He said tax values
were based on market values, and if market values decreased, so would tax values. Robinette asked
how the county would make up the difference -- through higher taxes or a reduction in services. He
requested that the proposals be remanded to the planning board and a stakeholders committee be
formed.
Ken Jurney, a resident in the East Monbo Road area, spoke about development and its
relationship with fire services. He said the Ratings Supervisor for the Office of the State Eire Marshal
had indicated that water delivery was the primary factor preventing Iredell's fire departments from
achieving ratings that offered homeowners and businesses the best insurance premium benefits. Jurney
said test results showed that inadequate water supply prevented district wide six ratings for Cool
Springs, Trinity, Troutman, and the West Iredell Fire Departments resulting in homeowner insurance
premiums being more than $2 million higher. Mr. Jurney requested that fire chiefs have input regarding
fire hydrant placements. In addition, he requested that for developments with water mains, that they be
required to have fire hydrants within 1,000 ft. of all lots. He said that for developments where mains
didn't exist, to require installation of a minimum 30,000 gallon water storage tank with well and hydrant
availability accessible to a loaded fire truck in all weather conditions, or to provide an accessible
minimum 30,000 gallon water source (pond, lake, stream) with a dry -hydrant accessible to a loaded fire
truck.
Bill Ballatow, a realtor with Allen Tate Realty, requested for the proposals to be tabled for
further study. He said it was a misconception to think realtors made their money by selling expensive
lake homes. Ballatow said in contrast, they made their living by selling the $50,000 to $100,000 or the
$300,000 to $400,000 homes to average people. He said in several areas of Mooresville, the housing
demand surpassed what was available. Ballatow said industries and companies were being recruited,
but the workers were finding it difficult to locate affordable housing. He said larger minimum lots
hurt only one group -- the working class. He said the health department could tell the builder if the lot
would perk for three bedrooms or more. Ballatow said the taxpayers approved a school bond
referendum by over a two -to -one margin to fund new schools, and this indicated a willingness to pay
higher taxes.
Darren Sandman, a property owner off the Amity Hill Road, said growth could not be stopped,
and if the proposals passed, the developers would just clear even more land to meet the guidelines. He
said the environment wasn't really being helped when huge swaths of land were cleared by the
developers. Mr. Sundman requested that the costs be passed to the builders -- not to the property
owners. He said his tax values would plummet, if he tried to sell his property. Sundman asked for
lower taxes if the proposals passed.
Vickie Kidd, owner of Kidd Realty in Mooresville, said part of her work involved the grouping
of large tracts of land for sale to developers. She said recently in Mecklenburg County, when lot sizes
changed, a project had to be completely cancelled by the developer, and this negatively impacted the
3
property owner. Kidd suggested that a committee be created, with a composition similar to what some
of the other speakers had mentioned, to serve as members.
Talmadge Kinney. referred to comments by Planning Supervisor Warren about adjacent counties
implementing minimum lot size requirements. Kinney said he didn't hear Rowan, Davie or Wilkes
County being mentioned. He said this was because they didn't have large bodies of water, and this was
the area in Iredell County having problems. Kinney said watershed areas were the counties' most
valuable resource, and they needed to be protected. He said there was poor planning when larger roads
were not built in the area. Kinney said mistakes were made when the roads were built just to meet the
demand and not for the future. Mr. Kinney said the minimum lot size proposal was countywide, and he
didn't see where there were traffic jams in Olin, Stony Point or Harmony. He said the county's tax base
would be reduced by the larger lots, that more property would be used up, and the working class would
be affected. Kinney said the problem sites were in the Brawley and Perth Road areas, or the lake. He
said the proposal should be restricted to the watershed areas.
Patty Marshall, a homeowner off the Brawley School Road, requested approval of the
moratorium until the Brawley School Road was widened. She said a realtor had falsely told her the road
would be widened in a year or so when she purchased a home in 2001. Marshall said many people had
been told this, and the road was not large enough to accommodate all the residents. She said in the
mornings, as she and all the other residents left to go to their workplaces, all of the construction people
came in to build more homes.
Mike Fisk, a resident of The Pointe off the Brawley School Road, said he worked in commercial
real estate, that he believed in the free market, and in property rights. Fisk said the peninsula's traffic
problems, especially in the early morning hours, were the worse he had ever seen. He said some type of
growth management initiatives were needed. Fisk said the public planning for the Brawley peninsula
was abysmal, and it had to be some of the worst planning anywhere in the United States. He said a
moratorium was a good idea until a long-term solution could be found. Additionally, he mentioned
staggering the school hours, better timing of the lights at Oaktree, and asking Crescent Resources to
loan the money to the state to get the road built.
Patricia Warlick, a local realtor, said entry level home buyers would be negatively impacted by
the minimum lot size proposal. She said excluding the Mooresville/Lake Norman areas, that between
January and the end of May 2006, the average closed sale price was $127,500. Warlick said looking at
a $100,000 home with a half -acre lot at $15,000.00, and then enlarging the lot to three-fourths of an
acre, the price increased to $22,500 (lot only). She said the $7500 increase was just for the land, and
this didn't include any improvements. Warlick said many builders were "generous" in trying to help
entry-level people by paying the closing costs, and she was afraid that a market of homes would not be
available if the lot sizes increased.
Karen Sheffield, said she was the Branch Manager for the Allen Tate Realty Office located on
the Brawley School Road, as well as a resident in the same area. Sheffield, a former resident of
Jacksonville, Florida, said one reason why she moved to North Carolina was because there wasn't any
affordable housing, and many people had to rent. She requested for the proposal to be postponed for
further study. Sheffield said halting growth would not correct the problems.
Lee Ann Cosack, a resident of the Brawley School Road area, said something had to be done.
Cosack said she had lived in the area since 1977, and the lack of infrastructure to support the growth
had caused an "untenable problem." She said morning commutes could take 45 minutes just for a
couple of miles. Cosack said the infrastructure needed to be installed before any new construction
occurred to keep the quality of life at a beneficial level for all residents. She said appointing a
committee was fine, but something needed to be done before the situation became worse. Mrs. Cosack
urged the board members to expand the lot sizes and to implement a moratorium.
CathyLynch, a Brawley School Road resident, business owner, and realtor/broker, said she
required home purchasers to sign a waiver about the road problem. She said the roadway had many
businesses, and much of the traffic was caused by people who did not reside in the area. Lynch said
the people were seeking services, such as those provided by the dance academy and the churches. She
said anytime a shopping center was built, people from outer areas would be attracted. Lynch said she
wasn't "big" on paying more taxes, but this might have to be done to achieve better roads and more
schools. She suggested that a committee study the proposal.
4
Charlene Allen, said she was a member of the Lake Norman Homebuilders Association and the
Iredell County Homebuilders Association; however, she was speaking as a private property owner.
Allen voiced concerns about being told what she could or could not do with her property. Mrs. Allen
said she wanted her property values to elevate and not decline by limiting what could be done. Allen
said she previously lived in the Brawley School Road area, but she relocated to Statesville to get away
from the traffic. She said it wasn't fair to all of the county's citizens to implement the lot size proposal
just to benefit the residents of one or two roads.
Karen Rainey, said she was a local lender in the county, and the average median income for this
area was $37,680. She said the proposal would not only impact the builders, but the buyers as well.
She said there had to be a more equitable way to find a solution for all citizens.
No one else desired to speak, and Chairman Tice adjourned the hearing.
Commissioner Johnson said that due to the minimum lot size amendment and the Interim
Development Ordinance being somewhat linked, he proposed that a decision regarding the lot sizes be
delayed until after the next public hearing on the agenda (Interim Development Ordinance).
MOTION by Commissioner Johnson to delay any action on the minimum lot size amendment
until after the Interim Development Ordinance public hearing.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays - 0.
Chairman Tice declared the meeting to be in a public hearing.
Consideration of an Interim Development Ordinance (IDO) (Suspension of the
Preliminary Approval of Subdivision Plats Within Targeted Areas of the County as of
July 1, 2006 and Extending through the End of the Year, or when Growth Management Measures
are Adopted: Planning Supervisor Warren said the staff was proposing a 180 -day suspension of major
subdivision plat review/approvals for areas around Perth Road, the Brawley School Road area, and the
Mt. Mourne area. He said subdivision review/approvals would not occur during the six months, while
the staff developed further growth management measures.
Commissioner Williams asked what size developments would be impacted by the moratorium.
Warren said 10 or more lots. He said minor plats, and other areas of the county would not be
affected.
Williams asked how many subdivisions had been reviewed in the target area since the board first
started discussing growth control measures.
Code Enforcement & Planning Director Lynn Niblock said during the first two weeks of June,
21 had been submitted, compared to a typical amount of 11 minor plats a month. Niblock said at this
pace, there would be a 300% increase in subdivision activity.
Williams asked if there was a reason behind the acceleration.
Niblock said it was speculation, but he would think the catalyst driving the increase was the
board members' discussion about growth control measures.
Williams said that if nothing were done in the next 120 days, probably more of the same activity
would be seen.
Niblock said this would be his opinion too.
Commissioner Johnson asked how the permits were spread out -- across the county or primarily
in the targeted areas.
Niblock said the information wasn't available; however, on major plats (county's jurisdiction) in
2006 there were two outside the targeted area, and these lots were in excess of 30,000 sq. ft. He said
5
five had occurred in the targeted area, and out of those, there was minimal impact when going from
30,000 to 40,000 sq. ft. (5%). Nibloek said three would have an average of about a 20-25% reduction in
the number of lots based on what had been recorded this year.
Chris Dawes, a resident of the Brawley peninsula since 1994, said she was a member of the
Brawley School Road Citizens Committee. She said the Brawley School Road improvement timeline
had been delayed two -and -a -half years with a completion date of 2010. Dawes said the road was
handling three times more than capacity, and there was one -way -in and one -way-out. She said there
were safety issues, and it was already known that 264 additional homes were to be built. Dawes said
that if the road improvements were delayed, the new construction should also be delayed. She said the
Brawley Citizens Committee members strongly supported the two proposals presented at the meeting.
Bill Ballatow, realtor with Allen Tate Realty, said the moratorium was wrong for a great portion
of the targeted area.
John Massey said he had lived in the Perth Road area all his life, and he was opposed to the
moratorium. Massey said he didn't know what could be accomplished in six months. He said (1)
family members desired to sell their property located in the area to pay for medical and nursing home
expenses and (2) a moratorium was an invasion of property rights.
Robb Collier, the Vice President of the Iredell County Homebuilders Association and local
realtor, asked if normal protocol had been used regarding the moratorium issue. He said homebuilders
were not causing the growth problems, rather the industry was responding to a need. Collier said that
when industry was recruited, it should be known that employees would need homes, schools, fire and
police protection, water and roads. He said the wrong message was being sent --
"We want industry and jobs, but we don't want the challenges associated with them." He said the jobs
created prosperity for all people in the community.
Roy Hauf said he had lived in the "state's biggest cul de sac" (Brawley School Road) since
1976. He said early on, he knew additional residents would move to the area, and the statement,
"We've got ours, but we don't want more people moving in," was not true. Mr. Hauf said he was
distressed that the Brawley School Road was lumped in with other areas of the county, especially since
Brawley had serious problems. He said regardless of what happened with the moratorium, something
was needed to help the Brawley area. He suggested that a moratorium, just on the Brawley School
Road, be approved.
No one else desired to speak, and Chairman Tice adjourned the hearing.
Commissioner Johnson said governing Iredell County was a challenge due to its diversity. He
said it was the only county in America that bordered nine other counties. Johnson said consequently,
there were two distinct cultures -- rural/agricultural in the north and increasingly urban in the southern
end. Mr. Johnson said it took $451,005 in tax base to keep one child in school per year. He said that
tax base wasn't achieved by the typical entry level homeowner with two kids, and these had to be
subsidized by someone else. Johnson said Iredell County funded the schools well above the state
average per student -- way above average on capital. He said that in North Carolina, counties did not
build roads, and state officials in the past ten years had "robbed" $1.5 billion out of the Highway Trust
Fund. He said if the state officials had been competent in the handling of the funds, discussions on
congested roads would not be occurring. Johnson said North Carolina had the highest gasoline tax in
the southeast, but yet, traveling anywhere over the NC line a person could find gas cheaper and roads
in better condition. He said that in spite of the state having a $2.4 billion surplus this year, the officials
spent it all, and then still took $175 million out of the Highway Trust Fund.
Johnson said his concerns about increasing the lot sizes stemmed from the fact that county staff
members were in the process of re-evaluation. He said the figures from this process would become the
basis for the new budget in a few months, or in January at the Winter Planning Session. Johnson said
that if the lot sizes were increased, the staff would have only a full two months to arrive at a
comparative sales analysis before tax bills were mailed. Mr. Johnson said he preferred not to make
decisions on a $140 to $150 million budget based on a two month real estate sales history.
Additionally, he said some people couldn't afford to live in large houses. He said obstacles should not
be created to prevent them from having a home. Mr. Johnson said that even though counties did not
build roads, people should be able to expect a reasonable response time from emergency vehicles,
6
especially in the Brawley School Road vicinity. He said that as a precautionary measure, the board
had recently placed a QRV in the area. Johnson said the road was congested, but much of the traffic
was occurring from people making a living.
MOTION by Commissioner Johnson to (1) not increase the lot sizes countywide to 30,000
square feet and (2) in conjunction with the Interim Development Ordinance, to deny the request of a
moratorium anywhere in the county. The staff is instructed, however, to remand the issue back to the
planning board for a serious review of growth measures on the Brawley peninsula and Perth Road.
Additionally, it is suggested for the planning board to conduct a series of public hearings over a period
of 120 days. Following this time period, a recommendation will be submitted.
Johnson said he was an advocate of interconnectivity. He said the planning board's review
should remain within the "realm" of the planning board, and he was not in favor of a separate
committee being appointed. Mr. Johnson clarified that pertaining to Perth Road, he was not talking
about the watershed, he was referring to any land mass that would have direct access to the road -- any
major thoroughfare for ingress/egress.
Commissioner Norman clarified that the stated motion would not increase the lot sizes across the
county.
Johnson said this was correct.
Commissioner Robertson said the most frustrating aspect of being a board member was the road
issue. He said the commissioners were blamed for the road conditions, and many complaints were
received from residents in the southern end. Robertson said during the hearings, people had stated (1)
there needed to be better planning, (2) that growth needed to be handled responsibly, and (3) that the
board was in favor of stopping growth. He said no one had ever said they were desirous of stopping
growth. Robertson said this needed to be eliminated from the debate. He said the original directive to
the planning staff was to look at the Brawley School Road and the Perth Road area. Robertson said
these two road areas were unique in that they had limited access. (In regards to Perth, he said a person
either had to go through Troutman or Hwy. 150. He said Cornelius Road was also becoming a
difficult commute.) Robertson said if nothing happened for Perth, it would become another Brawley
School Road. Mr. Robertson said no matter what happened, some limitations had to occur, and some
people would be unhappy. He said any plan would have limitations. Robertson said people would
complain if they couldn't build houses, and there would be complaints from people about their quality
of life being impacted by having more construction. He said there would be complaints about more
schools being needed, and this could result in higher taxes. Robertson said 12 to 18% of the county
had families with school-age children, and this showed that the majority of people who might have to
pay higher taxes did not even have children in the schools.
Robertson said he was in favor of sending the matter back to the planning board with a request
for a 120 -day review. In addition, he said he wasn't proposing a moratorium, but he would make the
following amendment to the motion:
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: That the interim development ordinance be amended to
state its effective date to be from July 1, 2006 to the earlier of October 31, 2006 instead of December
31. In addition on page eight, under major subdivision approvals, to amend it as follows:
Notwithstanding any provision of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations to the
contrary, no submittal of a major subdivision in the orange overlay south oj7-40 with direct access to
Perth Road shall be processed or approved within the targeted areas during the term of this
ordinance, without approval of the board of commissioners.
Robertson said that if the group came up with recommendations in 30 days, then the IDO would
be lifted. He said this would motivate people to come up with solutions faster. Robertson clarified
that his amendment included Perth and the Brawley School Road. He said that if the planning board
desired to redefine the orange overlay area (to draw it further south) that would be permissible.
Commissioner Johnson said the amendment still took in much of the Shiloh township.
Commissioner Williams suggested that the area be stated as south of Troutman on Perth Road.
7
Robertson said he was understanding that anything north of State Park Road would not be
included. He said the peninsula had to be included. Robertson then suggested that the area be defined
as both sides of Perth Road from Troutman south.
Planning Supervisor Warren said the boundaries on the maps were township lines. He said East
Monbo could be used.
Robertson said on the southside of East Monbo.
Chairman Tice questioned the time frame.
Commissioner Johnson said, "I'm trying to figure out how long 1 want to be the planning
board."
AMENDMENT CLARIFICATION: Commissioner Robertson said his proposal would be from
July I through November 30, 2006, or sooner, and on page eight, for it to read: no submittal of a
major subdivision in the orange overlay south of East Monbo Road with direct access to Perth Road
shall be processed or approved within the targeted areas during the term of this ordinance, without
approval of the board of commissioners.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the requests would go directly to the board of commissioners or
to the planning board.
Robertson said through the planning board.
Planning Supervisor Warren said subdivisions went through technical review and not to the
planning board.
Johnson said he didn't want to see personal property rights become to politicized. He said there
was a due process that needed to be considered. Mr. Johnson said a process was already in place, and
he didn't envision too much disturbance, if nothing occurred within 90 or 120 days.
Commissioner Williams thanked the planning staff and board for the expediency in bringing the
issues back to the commissioners. He said the growth measures had resulted from a request from the
five -person board of commissioners. Williams said the matter was discussed at the Winter Planning
Session, along with subsequent board meetings. Mr. Williams said the board, however, had never
asked for a countywide lot size increase. He said the request had been for a measure pertaining to the
Brawley School peninsula and Perth Road. Williams said he was not in agreement with the map
shown earlier in the meeting. He said during the two hearings, he had heard realtors blaming the
people purchasing homes for the problem, and the purchasers blaming the realtors. Mr. Williams said
it was time to do something about the issue, due to emergency service concerns, school needs,
infrastructure, and the quality of life that would suffer a decline. He said, however, the proposals were
a little "overboard" and he would support sending the issues back to the planning board, especially due
to the board (planning) having a diverse group of members and not special interest groups.
VOTING ON THE AMENDMENT: Ayes— 1 (Robertson); Nays -4.
(Amendment failed)
VOTING ON ORIGINAL MOTION: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
Chairman Tice called for a five-minute break
-----------------------------------------------------CONSENT AGENDA --------------------------------------------
MOTION by Commissioner Johnson to approve the following 21 consent agenda items.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
(All requests were described at the briefing session.)
9
1. Request for Consideration/Approval of the Following Three Road Abandonment Petitions
Submitted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation: Planning Supervisor Warren
presented the following three abandonment requests:
A. Abandonment of a Portion of State Road 1379 (Airport Road): This abandonment is due
to the expansion of the runway at the Statesville Airport and subsequent relocation of
Airport Road. A total of 1,180 feet is requested for abandonment, and 3,778 feet have been
added.
B. Abandonment of a Portion of State Road 1364 (Fleetwood Road): This abandonment is
due to expansion of the runway at the Statesville Airport and the subsequent relocation of
Fleetwood Road. A total of 850 feet has been requested for abandonment. A total of 953
feet has been added.
C. Abandonment of a Portion of State Road 1994 (Old Sloan's Mill Road): This
abandonment is for 480 feet on the southern end of Old Sloan's Mill Road, also known as
Silverbell Lane.
2. Request for a Decision Regarding First Refusal Rights on Surplus Property Owned by the
Iredell-Statesville School System (104 acres on Arey Road and 18.453 Acres on Lakeshore
Drive): Iredell- Statesville Schools' Construction Director Rob Jackson said the school system owned
these properties and desired to dispose of them. He said the Lakeshore Drive property was not on the
lake. He said it also wasn't suitable for school construction. Jackson said the 104 acres on Arey Road
was undesirable for public school purposes, and in accordance with G.S. 115C-518, the county was
being offered first refusal rights on both properties. (The county declined the offer, and the school
system will now be allowed to dispose of the properties.)
3. Request for Approval of the May 2006 Refunds and Releases: Tax Administrator Bill Doolittle
requested approval of the following refunds and releases.
MAY 2006 TAX RELEASES & REFUNDS
Releases
Refunds
County
20,705.41
588.34
Solid Waste Fees
65.00
0
East Alexander Co. Fire # 1
17.95
0
Shepherd's Fire # 2
109.99
10.16
Mount Mourne Fire # 3
97.60
0
All County Fire # 4
917.80
0
Statesville City
1,737.48
0
Statesville Downtown
36.25
0
Mooresville Town
8,683.74
562.10
Mooresville Downtown
0
0
Mooresville School
2,070.07
122.00
Love Valley
0
0
Harmony
1.28
0
Troutman
169.22
0
Total
34,611.79
1,282.60
A complete list, of the individual tax releases and refunds,
into the minutes by reference.
is hereby incorporated
4. Request from the Health Department for Approval of a "Well Program" Resolution: Health
Director Donna Campbell said legislation was being studied that would require the Commission for
Health Services to adopt rules concerning the inspection/testing of private water supply wells along with
wells serving transient water systems. She said if enacted, it would be necessary to hire three to four
additional registered sanitarians with startup costs being in excess of $100,000. Campbell said the board
of health had approved a resolution requesting adequate time to prepare for a well program. She
requested approval of the following resolution:
Well Program Resolution
1 redell County Board of Health
1 redell County Board of County Commissioners
I redell County, North Carolina
9
Whereas, Legislation is being proposed in the North Carolina House and Senate that will direct the Commission
for Health Services to adopt rules concerning local health department permitting inspection and testing of
Private water supply wells and wells serving transient water systems and to appropriate funds for local well
inspection and testing programs;
Whereas, safe potable water from private wells is important to the public's health;
Whereas, significant start-up funding will be necessary to adequately staff and equip a local well program;
Whereas, the supply of Registered Sanitarians is limited and recruitment and retention of Registered
Sanitarians is very difficult;
Whereas, a limited supply of RS. leads to hiring of intern level employees which required months of training to
be come authorized;
Whereas, the State Environmental Health Program has limited ability to provide RS training in a timely
manner;
Whereas, an adequate State Environmental Health support, training, and laboratory testing structure is needed
prior to implementation of a statewide local well program;
Whereas, a new well program will require training of existing supervisory and field staff;
Whereas, a new well program will require extensive amounts of time to develop local policies and procedures -
which should largely be consistent throughout the state;
Therefore Be It Resolved, the Iredell County Board of Health and Iredell County Commissioners supports
activities that lead to safe potable water from private wells - including development of a local well program; and
Therefore Be It Resolved, that the state assure adequate time is provided to budget for and hire local staff
prior to the implementation of a local well program; and
Therefore Be It Resolved, that the state assure adequate state infrastructure to support local counties in
testing, training and consultation prior to implementation of a local well program; and
Therefore Be It Resolved, that the state develop a template of a Local Well Program policy and procedures
for use by local health departments prior to the implementation of a local well program; and
Be it further resolved, that the state assure adequate start-up funding, planning time and training prior to
implementation of a local well program.
5. Request from the Health Department for Approval of the 2006-2007 Fee Schedule: Health
Director Campbell requested approval of the following fee schedules.
ALLIED HEALTH FEES
$35.00
$35.00
Proposed Fees
SERVICE DESCRIPTION FEES
FY 2004-2005
FEES FY 2005-2006
2006-2007
Medicaid & Sliding Scale services
$20.00
520-00
Programs for Community Groups/Organizations
W8205 Parenting Education Classes***
$76.00
$76.00
$76.00
97802 Nutri. Therapy initial assessment (p/15 min.
) $18.00
$18.00
$18.00
97803 Nutri Therapy subseq. assess (p/15 min.)
$18.00
$18.00
$18.00
S9442 Childbirth Education Classes
$22.00
$30.00
$30.00
Services for Community Members/Organizations
Basic Cholesterol Screen/Nutrition Ed (per 30 min.)$30.00
$35.00
$35.00
Full Lipid Profile & Nutrition Ed (per 30 min.)
$66.00
$30.00
$30.00
Breast Pump Rental (per month)
$20.00
$20.00
520-00
Programs for Community Groups/Organizations
Blood pressure/hypertension nutrition counseling
(per 30 min.)
$3.00
$15.00
$15.00
Community First Aid and CPR course
S45A0
$45.00
$45.00
Community First Aid and CPR (Adult, Infant &
Child CPR)
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
Professional Rescuer CPR (Adult, Infant &
Child CPR and AED) Does not include First Aid
NEW
$52.00
$52.00
Grocery Store Tour -Health Foods (per person)
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
Information booths at fairs or health fairs Donation
$0.00 and up
Donation $0.00 and up
Donation $0.00 and up
Health `topic Seminars (for City, State/County
10
germinal, civic groups, schools, churches and/
515.00
$15.00
Posters 8 1/2" x 17" (each) 55.00
or non -profits) Donation
$0.00 and up
Donation $0.00 and up
Donation $0.00 and up
Health Topic Seminars (Business & Industries
Brochures (per 100) $20.00
$20.00
$20.00
per person)**
$20.00
$5.00 to $100.00
$5.00 to S 100.00
Individual weight loss counseling (per 30 min.)
$10.00
515.00
515.00
Weight loss counseling (package of five 30 min
* County employees receive a S 10.00 discount when group sessions are held
$200.00
Type III b, IV - VI System
sessions)
$30.00
560.00
560.00
Stress Management Class*
$40.00
54200
540.00
Smoking Cessation Class*
$40.00
$40.00
540.00
Lighten -up (Weight loss & Stress mngmnt)*
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
Health Education events** 0.00 to $10.00
$0.00 to $100.00
$0.00 to $1 OOAO
Health Education Products ****
Pamphlets (per 100) 515.00
515.00
$15.00
Posters 8 1/2" x 17" (each) 55.00
$5.00
$5.00
Videos (each) $40.00
54200
$4000
Brochures (per 100) $20.00
$20.00
$20.00
Curriculum $40.00
$40.00
$40.00
Manuals $20.00
$20.00
$20-00
Other products** $0.00-$100.00
50.00 - S100.00
50.00 - S100.00
* County employees receive a S 10.00 discount when group sessions are held
$200.00
Type III b, IV - VI System
** Cost based on staff time, materials used & length of presentation
$900.00
$575.00
*** Medicaid does not reimburse
Repairs
**** Will only charge agencies outside the county for these products
Type I - III System (except III b)
$350.00
$350.00
Environmental Health Division
No Change in Fees Requested
Local Food Plan Review
Restaurant
REGULAR
SCHEDULE
FAST TRACK FEE
SERVICE DESCRIPTION
FEES FY 2005-2006
PROPOSED FEES
$100.00
Meat Market
FY 2006-2007
Fees FY 05-06 Fees FY 06-07
New System Permits
Renovations
$100.00
Type I - III System (except III b)
$350.00
$350.00
$200.00
$200.00
Type III b, IV - VI System
$900.00
$900.00
$575.00
$575.00
Repairs
Type I - III System (except III b)
$350.00
$350.00
$200.00
$200.00
Type III b, IV - VI System
$900.00
$900.00
$575.00
$575.00
Relavouts
Limited
$100.00
$100.00
$50.00
$50.00
Comprehensive:
$200.00
$200.00
Type 1- III System (except III b)
$350.00
$350.00
Type III b, IV - VI System
$900.00
$900.00
Existing System Inspection
$100.00
$100.00
$50.00
$50.00
Site Revisit Fee
$50.00
$50.00
Not applicable
Water Sample
Bacteriological, Inorganic
530.00
$30.00
Pesticide, Petroleum, VOC
$50.00
$50.00
Swimming Pool Permit
Operating < 8 months
$100.00
$100.00
Operating 8+months
$150.00
$150.00
Initial Plans Review
$150.00
$150.00
Tattoo Artist Permit (annually)
$200.00
$200.00
Local Food Plan Review
Restaurant
$200.00
5200.00
Food Stand
$100.00
$100.00
Meat Market
$100.00
$100.00
Renovations
$100.00
$100.00
***Water sample fee will be waived for samples collected at a physician's request as part of a diagnostic procedure.
CPT CODE SERVICE DESCRIPTION
New Patient Preventive Health Visits
99381 Age under 1 year
99382 Age 1-4 years
99383 Age 5-11 years
99384 Age 12-17 years
99385 Age 18-39 years
99386 Age 40-64 years
99387 Age 65 years & over
Proposed
Preventive Health Fee Schedule for
FY 2006-2007
Established
Patient Preventive Health
Visits
Amount of
FY 2004.2005
FY 2005-06
FY 2006-2007
Change
$99.00
$99.00
$112.00
$13.00
$106.00
$106.00
$120.00
$14.00
$115.00
$115.00
$129.00
$14.00
$125.00
$125.00
$137.00
$12.00
$167.00
$167.00
$186.00
$19.00
$199.00
$199.00
$203.00
$4.00
$215.00
$215.00
$229.00
$14.00
Established
Patient Preventive Health
Visits
99391
Age under 1 year
$90.00
99392
Age 1-4 years
$90.00
99393
Age 5-11 years
$95.00
99394
Age 12-17 years
$105.00
99395
Age 18-39 years
$142.00
99396
Age 40-64 years
$158.00
99397
Age 65 years & over
$175.00
New Patient Evaluation and Management Visits
99201
Minimal
$70.00
99202
Limited
$90.00
99203
Expanded
$128.00
99204
Detailed
$188.00
99205
Comprehensive
$236.00
Delivery Fee
59409 Vaginal Delivery $1,000.00
59514 Cesarean Delivery $1,000.00
Established Patient Evaluation and Management Visits
99211
Minimal
$38.00
99212
Limited
$55.00
99213
Expanded
$76.00
99214
Detailed
$118.00
99215
Comprehensive
$176.00
12
$90.00
$92.00
$2.00
$90.00
$97.00
$7.00
$95.00
$106.00
$11.00
$105.00
$115.00
$10.00
$142.00
$155.00
$13.00
$158.00
$169.00
$11.00
$175.00
$192.00
$17.00
$70.00 $79.00 $9.00
$94.00 $98.00 $4.00
$133.00 $133.00 $0.00
$195.00 $195.00 $0.00
$245.00 $246.00 $1.00
$1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00
$1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00
$38.00
$42.00
$4.00
$57.00
$60.00
$3.00
$79.00
$79.00
$0.00
$123.00
$123.00
$0.00
$183.00
$183.00
$0.00
Laboratory
82947
Glucose
$19.00
$19.00
$21.00
$2.00
82950
1 hour Glucola
$25.00
$25.00
$28.00
$3.00
82951
GTT (3 hr)
$55.00
$55.00
$61.00
$6.00
82952
GTT Specimen 4
$15.00
$15.00
$16.00
$1.00
85013
Hematocrit
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$0.00
82270
Occult Blood (pt collected)
$5.00
$15.00
$10.00
82272
Occult Blood (from Exam)
$23.00
$23.00
$0.00
81002
Urine Dipstick
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$0.00
81000
Urine with micro
$19.00
$19.00
$20.00
$1.00
81025
Pregnancy test (urine)
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$0.00
87210
Wet Prep (PVT. PAY $0.00)
$20.00
$20.00
$21.00
$1.00
87070
GC culture
$36.00
$36.00
$36.00
$0.00
82465
Cholesterol
$20.00
$20.00
$21.00
$1.00
87205
Gram Stains
$21.00
$21.00
$21.00
$0.00
89300
Semen Analysis
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$0.00
87164
Darkfield
$49.00
Discontinued
36415
Venipuncture/stick
$12.00
$12.00
$13.00
$1.00
36416
Finger/heel stick
New
$12.00
$13.00
$1.00
99000
Handling fee
$14.00
$14.00
$14.00
$0.00
G0001
Medicaid Venipuncture
$12.00
(ended 12/31/2004)
Office Procedure
54050
Wart Treatment/Male
$134.00
$134.00
$134.00
$0.00
56501
Wart Treatment/Female
$134.00
$134.00
$134.00
$0.00
76815
Ultrasound
$188.00
$188.00
$203.00
$15.00
59025
Non -Stress test
$125.00
$125.00
$133.00
$8.00
59412
Cephalic Version/External
$550.00
$550.00
$609.00
$59.00
11976
Norplant Removal
$210.00
$210.00
$174.00
($36.00)
58300
IUD Insertion
$86.00
$87.00
$225.00
$138.00
J7300
ParaGard T T380
$344.00
$359.00
$359.00
$0.00
58301
IUD Removal
$95.00
$95.00
$95.00
$0.00
99070
IUD Supply
Discontinued
57170
Diaphragm Fitting
$117.00
$117.00
$104.00
($13.00)
96111
Denver Developmental
$114.00
$114.00
$172.00
$58.00
92551
Audiometry
$23.00
$23.00
$25.00
$2.00
92582
Conditioning Play Audiometry
$26.00
$26.00
$72.00
$46.00
69210
Ear Irrigation
$67.00
$67.00
$77.00
$10.00
99173
Vision Screening
$24.00
$24.00
$19.00
($5.00)
59430
Postpartum care only
$130.00
$130.00
$174.00
$44.00
92588
Diagnostic
Otoacoustic
@Multiple Levels &
Frequencies $54.00 $54.00 $71.00 $17.00
13
FEES FY 2004- FEES FY 2005 -
CPT CODE SERVICE DESCRIPTION 2005 2006
Immunizations/Injections
$20.00
$0.00
3.00
$3.00
90782
Therapeutic/diag. Admin. Fee
$10.00
$18.00
$26.00
$8.00
90471
Admin. single vaccine
$8.00
$8.00
$10.00
$2.00
Admin. single vaccine (Medicaid
90471EP
VFC)
$20.00
$20.00
$28.00
$8.00
90472
Admin. 2+ vaccines
$5.00/each
$5.00/each
$5.00
$0.00
90788
Admin. antibiotics
$23.00
$23.00
$28.00
$5.00
90384
RHO Gam
$111.00
$111.00
$119.00
$8.00
J1055
Depo-Provera
$45.00
$54.00
$54.00
$0.00
90636
Twinrix - Hep A & B 9/14/2004
$60.00
$60.00
$60.00
$0.00
90716
Adult Varicella
$62.00
$67.00
$70.00
$3.00
90707
Adult MMR
$40.00
$42.00
$45.00
$3.00
90733
Adult Meningitis
$73.00
$87.00
$89.00
$2.00
90734
Menactra
New Vaccine
$83.00
$89.00
$6.00
90746
Adult Hepatitis B
$64.00
$64.00
$64.00
$0.00
90632
Adult Hepatitis A
$58.00
$67.00
$67.00
$0.00
90633
Ped/Adol. Hepatitis A
$30.00
$30.00
$30.00
$0.00
90658
Influenza Vaccine
$10.00
$12.00
$15.00
$3.00
90657
Influenza Vaccine (1/2 dose)
$10.00
$12.00
$15.00
$3.00
90732
Pneumonia Vaccine
$19.00
$21.00
$22.00
$1.00
86580
PPD (TB Skin Test)
$19.00
$19.00
$21.00
$2.00
90669
Prevnar - private stock
$71.00
$71.00
$72.00
$1.00
90713
Polio - private stock
$27.00
$27.00
$28.00
$1.00
Miscellaneous
C9983/LU
Pill Replacement
$7.00
$7.00
$7.00
$0.00
S9445**
MOW (billable in units)
$17.00
$17.00
Discontinued
T1016**
Child Service Coordination
$21.00
$22.00
$22.00
$0.00
T1017**
MCC (billable in units)
$30.00
$30.00
$30.00
$0.00
99501
Postpartum Home visit - Mom
$60.00
$60.00
$60.00
$0.00
99502
Newborn Assessment - Infant
$60.00
$60.00
$60.00
$0.00
RN services (TB /STD
T1002** billable in units)
Health Choice
PAY03 Co- Pay
Health Choice
PAY05 Co- Pay
Health Choice
PAY10 Co- Pay
Completion of
Record of TB Screen
LU102 -DHHS-3405
$20.00 $20.00
$20.00
$0.00
3.00
$3.00
0.00
$5.00
$5.00
$0.00
$10.00
$10.00
$0.00
14
0 $10.00 $10.00
** 1 unit = 15 minutes
ALLIED HEALTH DENTAL FEES
FY FEES FY FEES FY Proposed FEES
CDTCODE
SERVICE DESCRIPTION
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
00120
Recall exam
529.00
$34.00
$34.00
00140
Emergency exam
539.00
$48.00
$48.00
00150
Initial oral exam
S5R00
$60.00
$60.00
00210
Complete series x-rays
$76.00
587.00
$87.00
00220
Periapical x-ray
514.00
519.00
$19.00
00230
Periapical - twoormore
$12.00
$16.00
$16.00
00240
Occlusal P.A.
$24.00
529.00
$29.00
00270
Bitewings - singlefilm
512.00
$19.00
$19.00
00272
Bitewings - x 2
523.00
531.00
$31.00
00274
Bitewings - x 4
542.00
543.00
$43.00
00330
Panorex x-rays
560.00
576.00
$76.00
01 1 10
Prophy (adult) 13 & older
$50.00
$63.00
$63.00
01120
Prophy (child) age Tess than 13
538.00
546.00
$46.00
01201
Prophy w/fluoride (child 43)
$51.00
565.00
$65.00
01203
Prophy w/fluoride varnish « 13)
$20.00
S26.00
$26.00
01204
Florida varnish (13 - 20 yrs)
$25.00
526.00
$26.00
01205
Prophy w/fluoride (adult 13))
562.00
56290
$62.00
01330
Oral Hyg. Under 3 years
525.00
$25.00
$25.00
01351
Sealants
532.00
537.00
$37.00
01510
Space Main!. Fixed - Unilateral
5209.00
5224.00
$224.00
01515
Space Main!. Fixed - Bilateral
5419.00
5425.00
$425.00
01520
Remove Spc Main!. Unilateral
580.00
5150.00
$150.00
01525
Remvl Spc Main!. Bilateral
585.00
5160.00
$160.00
01550
Recement Space Main!.
560.00
560.00
$60.00
02140
Amalgam I surf. - perm/primary
$66.00
588.00
$88.00
02150
Amalgam 2 surf. - perm/prhnary,
$83.00
S 114.00
$114.00
02160
Amalgam 3 surf. - pemt/primary
$102.00
$140.00
$140.00
02161
Amalgam 4 surf. -penn/primary
$124.00
5167.00
$167.00
02330
Resin I surf. - anterior
$78.00
5105.00
$105.00
02331
Resin 2 surf. - anterior
$95.00
5131.00
$131.00
02332
Resin 3 surf. - anterior
$120.00
516290
$162.00
02335
Resin 4 surf. - anterior
$141.00
5175.00
$175.00
02390
Resin based composite crown anterior
$167.00
5275.00
$275.00
02391
Resin based composite 1 surface
$80.00
S118.00
$118.00
02392
Resin based composite 2 surfaces
$120.00
S158.00
$158.00
02393
Resin based composite 3 sur faces
$160.00
S196.00
$196.00
02394
Resin based composite 4 or more
surfaces
S19R00
5237.00
$237.00
02920
Recement Crown
S60.00
57590
$75.00
02930
SSC - primary
5145.00
5185.00
$185.00
02931
SSC - permanent
5174.00
5219.00
$219.00
02940
Sedative filling
559.00
$72.00
$72.00
02950
Crown build-up
5100.00
5180.00
$180.00
02951
Pin placement
522.00
545.00
$45.00
02970
Temporary crown
5139.00
5220.00
$220.00
03110
Pulp cap direct
535.00
557.00
$57.00
03220
Pulpotomy Exc!. rest
$103.00
5133.00
$133.00
03310
RCT - anterior
$369.00
5484.00
$484.00
03330
RCT - molar
5405.00
5700.00
$700.00
03351
Recalcification - initial visit
$174.00
$240.00
$240.00
03352
Recal.-Interim medication replemm.
$125.00
$180.00
$180.00
03353
Recalcification final visit
$200.00
$350.00
$350.00
04210
Gingivectomy/Gingivoplasty
$125.00
$420.00
$420.00
04211
Gingitomy/gingiplsty 1-3 continous teeth
$115.00
$155.00
$155.00
04240
Gingival flap proced. 4 or more p/quad
$125.00
$490.00
$490.00
04241
Gingival flap proced 1 3 per quad
$125.00
$420.00
$420.00
04341
Root planning/scale 4 or more
$141.00
$174.00
$174.00
04342
Periodontal scaling & root planing 1-3
$110.00
$122.00
$122.00
04355
Gross scale - perio
$103.00
$129.00
$129.00
04910
Periodontal maint. Treatment
$77.00
$97.00
$97.00
05211
Maxillary partian denture
$450.00
$450.00
07111
Coronal Remnants -Deciduous Teeth
$80.00
$97.00
$97.00
07140
Ext. erupted tooth or exposed root
$80.00
$109.00
$109.00
07210
Surgical ext. - erupted
$136.00
$180.00
$180.00
07220
Soft tissue impact
$97.00
$219.00
$219.00
07230
Partial bony impact
$155.00
$281.00
$281.00
07240
Bony impact
$250.00
$347.00
$347.00
07241
Bony impact w/complications
$300.00
$404.00
$404.00
07250
Residual roots - unerupted
$120.00
$218.00
$218.00
07270
Tooth Reimplantation
$150.00
$386.00
$386.00
07510
1 & 0 intra oral
$153.00
$158.00
$158.00
09110
Emergency palliative treatment
$35.00
$50.00
$50.00
15
09230 Analgesia
$45.00 $49.00 $49.00
09610 Drug injection
$48.00 $75.00 $75.00
09630 Other drug/medication
$26.00 $40.00 $40.00
' Medicaid does not cover effective 101112004
521,927.58
" Medicaid end dated 1213112004
68,310.00
•• Medicaid reimburses for procedure as of 11112005
60,563.85
General Construction
3,077,844.00
6. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #46 for the Appropriation of $22,255 in 2005-
2006 Justice Assistance Grant Funds & $13,727 in 2006-2007 Grant Funds: Mike Phillips, with
the Sheriff's Department, said the grant funds of $22,255 would be used to purchase Crime Scene
Investigation equipment (fuming chamber L $4800; vac chamber cr $1870; latent work station @
$7500; filters @ $2400, and a work station @ $5600) and the $13,727 would be used to purchase two
forensic alternate light source units.
7. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #47 to Appropriate Reallocated Funds of
$6,000 to the Criminal Justice Partnership Program (CJPP): Acting County Manager
Blumenstein said the CJPP was reallocated $6,000 in additional funds from the NC Dept. of
Corrections, and the budget amendment would appropriate the funds to the program.
8. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #48 to Recognize Revenues Received in Excess
of Budget & for Appropriation to Expenditure Line Items in the Health Care Benefits Fund
(HCBF): Acting County Manager Blumenstein said no new funds were being requested, rather an
amendment was needed in case actual claims for June exceeded the amount remaining in the HCBF.
Blumenstein said after July 1, with the new budget, it would be too late for an amendment.
9. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #49 to Recognize Commissary Sales ($15,000)
and to Appropriate for Commissary Purchases and to Recognize Federal Inmate Fees ($96,000)
along with an Appropriation to Contracted Food Services for Additional Costs Incurred: Acting
County Manager Blumenstein requested approval of this budget amendment. She noted that federal
fees did not fully pay for inmate (federal) housing or upkeep.
10. Request for Approval of Budget #50 to Appropriate Seized Funds of $40,000 towards the
Special Appropriation for the Civil Air Patrol Aircraft Hangar Purchase & to Appropriate
$10,000 for Crime Prevention ("Confidential Operations"): (See briefing minutes for additional
information.)
11. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #51 for the Purpose of Closing Out the Public
Library Capital Project Fund Along with Adoption of an Amended Capital Project Ordinance:
Acting County Manager Blumenstein said the library project had been completed and unused funds of
$281,638 needed to be transferred to the Capital Reserve Fund.
Amended Capital Project Ordinance
Ircdcll County Public Library
Be it Ordained by the Board of Comity Commissioners of lredell County, North Carolina:
Section 1. Funds for this Capital Project Fund were provided from the following sources:
Original + Closing
Amendments Amendment Final
City of Statesville Contribution
Sales Tax Refunds
Investment Earnings
Value ofDonated Building Materials
NC Library Ser & Tech Grant
NCLST Internet Structure Grant
Transfers from Capital Reserve Fund
$ 1,200,000.00 - $1,200,000.00
68515.16 68515.16
- 229.47 229.47
50,000.00 - 50,000.00
69,600.00 (7,308.00) 62,292.00
22,800.00 (1,694.40) 21,105.60
5,377 682.00 5,377,682.00
6.720.082.00 59.742.23 $6.779.824.23
Section 2. The following costs for the design, construction, and famishing of the
Ircdcll County Public Library were financed by this fund:
Design, Engineering, & Other Costs
$ 375,070.00
(3,753.70)
S 371,316.30
Property Acquisition
525,175.00
(3,247.42)
521,927.58
Demolition & Land Preparation
68,310.00
(7,746.15)
60,563.85
General Construction
3,077,844.00
(0.94)
3,077,843.06
Construction Costs — Other
69,985.00
(5.81)
69,979.19
Electrical
445,192.00
(0.92)
445,191.08
Mechanical
717,340.00
(0.65)
717.339.35
Plumbing
162,620.00
(0.24)
162,619.76
16
Depreciable Assets
178,356.00
(350.61)
178,005.39
Non -depreciable assets
165,644.00
(0.88)
165,643.12
Furniture, Fixtures- & Equipment
659,500.00
83.55
659,583.55
Other Project Costs
275,046.00
(206,872.22)
68,173.78
Transfers to Capital Reserve Fund
-
6.720,082.00
281 638.22
59.742.23
281,638.22
6.779.824.23
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund is complete and the fund is being closed.
The balance of the Project Fund shall be transferred back to the Capital Reserve Fund.
12. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #52 for the Purpose of Closing Out the Tax
Administration & Land Records Facility's Capital Project Fund Along with Adoption of an
Amended Capital Project Ordinance: Acting County Manager Blumenstein said the tax administration
and land records building project was about completed, and $85,000 remained in the project fund. She
recommended that $23,000 be transferred to the General Fund, with $20,000 appropriated to
maintenance and repairs, and $3,000 to non -depreciable assets. Blumenstein said the funds would be
used to purchase furniture and for HVAC repairs. She said the remaining $62,605 would be transferred
to Capital Reserve for future projects.
Tax Administration & Land Records Facility's Capital Project Fund
Amended Capital Project Fund
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina:
Section 1. Funds for this Capital Project Fund were provided by the following source: Original Closing
Amendments Amendment Final
Operating Transfers from the Capital Reserve Fund
Sales Tax Refunds
Investment Earnings
Section 2. The following costs to renovate the "old" Library on Water Street for
the use as a public facility for Tax Administration and Land Records were
paid from this fund:
General Construction
Construction Costs - Other
Professional Services
Contingency
Department Supplies (items less than $1,000)
Contracted Services - Other
Depreciable Assets
Non -depreciable Assets
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
Transfer to General Fund
Transfer to Capital Reserve Fund
Section 3. This Capital Project is complete and the Fund is being closed. Remaining
funds shall be transferred back to the Capital Reserve Fund.
This Amended Project Ordinance is effective upon adoption.
$1,335,000 $1,335,000
19,095 19,095
S 954,000
Original+
Amendment
$ 954,000
70,920
(1,685)
69,235
11,000
(11,000)
-
29,080
(29,080)
-
86,675
5,315
91,990
20,000
(10,257)
9,743
117,500
(12,236)
105,264
45,825
(15,722)
30,103
-
10,665
10,665
21918
23,000
23,000
5,304
61605
62,605
$1,335,000
21.605
S 1,356,605
13. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #53 for the Purpose of Closing Out the Stumpy
Creek Park Capital Project Fund Along with Adoption of an Amended Capital Project Ordinance:
Acting County Manager Blumenstein said the irrigation system and lighting projects for the Stumpy Creek
Park were now completed, and the park project was finished. She said any future improvements would be
made through the General Fund. Blumenstein requested approval to close out the park's capital project
ordinance as follows:
Amended Stumpy Creek Capital Project Ordinance
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina:
Section I. The following costs were financed by this fund:
17
Original+
Amendment
Final Amendment
Final
Stumpy Creek General Construction
$748,176
5,715
753,891
Professional Services
75,155
1,747
76,902
Land & Land Improvements (Field Lights)
100,000
(731)
99,269
Irrigation System
60A00
-
60,000
Gallyon Memorial
22,485
995
23,480
Transfer to Parks Capital Reserve Fund
25,340
(2,422)
21918
$1,031,156
5,304
$1,036,460
17
Section 2. Funds- for this Capital Project Fund were provided from the following sources:
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund is complete.
Section 4. The Parks Capital Reserve Fund advanced $100,000 to the Stumpy Creek Project Fund for completion of the project. This advance
is to be repaid annually by reducing the outstanding advance by %4 of any operating transfer from the General Fund to the Parks
Reserve Fund.
Section 5. The funds remaining in the Stumpy Creek Project Fund at completion of the project are being transferred to the Parks Capital
Reserve Fund and applied as a reduction to the advance.
Section 6. The Parks Reserve Fund advanced $30,000 to Stumpy Creek Park Project for the installation of an irrigation system (total cost
$60,000). This advance is to be repaid from boat ramp user fees deposited to the General Fund. The first $5,000 of boat ramp user
fees collected each fiscal year shall be made available for maintenance of the ramp. All receipts in excess of $5,000 will be
transferred to the Parks Reserve Fund to reduce the outstanding advance.
Section 7. The ordinance is effective upon adoption.
14. Request for the Adoption of a Capital Project Ordinance for the Mooresville Graded Schools'
Construction Projects: Acting County Manager Blumenstein requested approval of the following project
ordinance for the new Mooresville Intermediate School. She said General Obligation Bonds and Certificates
of Participation had been issued to finance the construction.
Iredell County, North Carolina
Mooresville Graded School District
School Construction Projects - 2006
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina:
Original +
Amendment
Final Amendment
Final
Parks & Recreation Trust Grant
$250,000
-
250,000
Community Contributions
135,000
3,777
138,777
Contributions -Irrigation System
30,000
-
30,000
Contributions -Field Lights
100,000
4,200
104,200
Memorials
22,485
2,278
24,763
Transfers from Parks Capital Reserve Fund
240,626
-
240,626
Transfers from General Fund
128,045
(6,251)
121,794
Investment Earnings
125,000
1,300
126,300
$1,031,156
5,304
$1,036,460
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund is complete.
Section 4. The Parks Capital Reserve Fund advanced $100,000 to the Stumpy Creek Project Fund for completion of the project. This advance
is to be repaid annually by reducing the outstanding advance by %4 of any operating transfer from the General Fund to the Parks
Reserve Fund.
Section 5. The funds remaining in the Stumpy Creek Project Fund at completion of the project are being transferred to the Parks Capital
Reserve Fund and applied as a reduction to the advance.
Section 6. The Parks Reserve Fund advanced $30,000 to Stumpy Creek Park Project for the installation of an irrigation system (total cost
$60,000). This advance is to be repaid from boat ramp user fees deposited to the General Fund. The first $5,000 of boat ramp user
fees collected each fiscal year shall be made available for maintenance of the ramp. All receipts in excess of $5,000 will be
transferred to the Parks Reserve Fund to reduce the outstanding advance.
Section 7. The ordinance is effective upon adoption.
14. Request for the Adoption of a Capital Project Ordinance for the Mooresville Graded Schools'
Construction Projects: Acting County Manager Blumenstein requested approval of the following project
ordinance for the new Mooresville Intermediate School. She said General Obligation Bonds and Certificates
of Participation had been issued to finance the construction.
Iredell County, North Carolina
Mooresville Graded School District
School Construction Projects - 2006
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina:
$18,338,000
Section 2. The following costs for school projects shall be paid by this fund:
Professional Fees- Architect
Original
Section I. Funds for this Capital Project Fund will be provided from the following sources:
Ordinance
GO Bond Proceeds (Includes Premium)
$8,294,582
COPS Proceeds
8,200,000
Contribution - Mooresville Graded Schools
1,543,418
Sales Taxes Reimbursed
300,000
$18,338,000
Section 2. The following costs for school projects shall be paid by this fund:
Professional Fees- Architect
$380,174
Construction Management
95,043
Testing, Permits, and Other Fees
150,000
Closing Costs
64,583
General Construction
Contract
16,272,100
(1) Unencumbered
Water/Sewer
250,000
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
1,126,100
18338 000
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund shall continue until the projects are complete.
Section 4. Transfers between line items shall only be made upon formal action by the Mooresville Graded Schools Board of Education and
such action shall be reported to the Iredell County Board of Commissioners at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Section 5. Payments from this Capital Project Fund shall be authorized by the County Manager or his designee.
15. Request for the Adoption of an Amended Capital Project Ordinance for the Iredell-Statesville
Schools Construction Projects: Acting County Manager Blumenstein requested approval of the
following amended capital project ordinance. She said since February 7, when the original ordinance
was adopted, Certificates of Participation had been issued, and all bids had been awarded. Blumenstein
noted that the Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) in the February ordinance had been deleted as a
funding source, and the contribution from the Iredell-Statesville Schools had been increased.
18
Iredell Courriy, Nath Carolina
Capital Project Orli
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Comrissoners of Iredell Canty, North Carolina:
Section 1. Funds far this Capital Project Fund will be provided from the follo✓dng sources:
OW. • • ••e••.
Rblic School Building Capital Furl
Coutnbution - Iredell Statesville Schools
Soles Tares Reirnbiserl
Contract
(1) Uhartantered
Grading, Excavation & Other
Water/serer
Transitions Costs(mobiles)
Land Purchases
Furniture, Fixtures & Ecuprrent
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund shall continue until the projects are cooplete.
66,539,520
2,735,117
rr.
Original
Orlinarce
ArrcrMnent
Anherrded
Ordnarroe
$ 36,400,000
85,002
36,485,002
35,000,000
2,549,998
37,5491998
2,000,000
(2,000,000)
-
3,500,000
-
3,500,000
492,055
2,337,945
2,830,000
860,710
860,710
$ 77,392,055 3,833,655 $ 81,225,710
$ 4,623,294
77,427
4,700,721
910,114
(299,998)
610,116
513,500
(16,800)
496,700
645,000
(10,000)
635,000
65,170,483
4,104,154
69,274,637
-
1,020,000
1,020,000
121,000
120,000
2,790000
(1815,000)
975,000
1,220,000
566,000
1,786,000
1,519,665
87,871
1,607,536
$ 77,392,055
3,833,655 $
81,225,710
Secfion 4. Transfers between line Hens shall only be rrgde upon bod action by the Irecall-Statesville Board of Education or Mooresville Graded
School Distnd BCE and such actor stall be reported to the Iredell County Board of Comriss cners at its next regularly sdhedhled
meeting.
Sections. Paym.'nts fromthis Capital Project Fund shall be authonzed bythe Ceunty Manager a his designee.
16. Request for the Adoption of a Capital Project Ordinance for the Mitchell Community College
Construction Project: Acting County Manager Blumenstein requested approval of the following MCC project
ordinance. She said $700,000 in General Obligation Bonds had been issued for a land purchase. Blumenstein
said the remaining $5.3 million in bonds would be issued when design work was completed and bids had been
received.
Iredell County, North Carolina
Mitchell Community College
Community College Construction Projects - 2006
Be it Ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina:
Original
Section I. Funds for this Capital Project Fund will be provided from the following sources: Ordinance
GO Bond Proceeds S 700,000
19
Section 2. The following costs for school projects shall be paid by this fund:
Professional Fees - Architect
Construction Management
Testing, Permits, and Other Fees
Closing Costs
General Construction
Contract
(1) Unencumbered
Land & Land Improvements
Water/Sewer
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
Section 3. This Capital Project Fund shall continue until the projects are complete.
700,000
Section 4. Transfers between line items shall only be made upon formal action by the MCC Board of Trustees and such action shall
be reported to the Iredell County Board of Commissioners at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Section 5. Payments from this Capital Project Fund shall be authorized by the County Manager or his designee.
17. Request from the Mooresville -South Iredell Economic Development Corporation for
Permission to List Iredell County as a Supporter in the Printed Materials Distributed for the
"Partners in Progress" Campaign: Acting County Manager Blumenstein said the Mooresville
Chamber of Commerce had a five year strategic plan and a capital campaign to raise $1.8 million. She
said the county already funded the Mooresville -South Iredell Economic Development Corporation
($111,180), and additional funds were not being requested. Blumenstein said the actual request was to
list Iredell County as a supporter in the printed materials for the campaign.
18. Presentation from Assistant County Manager Tracy Jackson Regarding the County
Visions Project (Scope of Work, the Process, & the Estimated Cost: The board requested a
presentation from the consultant at the July 18 meeting. Assistant County Manager Jackson will
inform the consultant. (See briefing minutes for additional information.)
19. Request for Approval of the May 30, 2006 Budget Minutes & the June 6, 2006 Briefing and
Regular Minutes
20. Request for Approval of Budget Amendment #54 to Appropriate $12,890 in Fund Balance
& to Transfer the Same Amount to the Parks Capital Reserve Fund: Acting County Manager
Blumenstein requested approval of a budget amendment to transfer $6,460 in FY 04 boat launch fees
and $6,430 in FY 05 boat launch fees from the General Fund to the Parks Capital Reserve Fund.
21. Request from the Register of Deeds for Approval, in Accordance with G.S. 153A-103,
to Hire a Relative: Register of Deeds Brenda Bell requested permission to hire her nephew's wife.
She said in accordance with state statutes, the commissioners had to approve the hiring of a "relative
by blood or marriage of nearer kinship than a first cousin" in the Register of Deeds' Office or the
Sheriffs Dept. (Note: In October of 2004, Mrs. Bell received permission for her niece to work in the
office. This relative, however, is no longer employed in the office.)
END OF CONSENT AGENDA -------------------------------
ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES OCCURRING ON BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
School Facilities Task Force (3 announcements)
APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
submitted, and Chairman Tice made a
meeting.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
Committee (4 appointments): No nominations were
to postpone these four appointments until the July
20
Re ion F Ain Advisory Committee 2 appointments): No nominations were submitted,
and Commissioner Williams made a motion to postpone the two appointments until the July meeting.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: A comment period was offered, but no one desired to speak.
NEW BUSINESS: Commissioner Johnson said Mrs. Blumenstein had sent a letter to the board
about the elections equipment required by the NC State Board of Elections. Johnson said the cost of the
ballots, using the state's mandated vendor, was $30,215.05 compared to a local printer's cost of $9,639.63.
Johnson said the $30,000 was three times the budgeted amount, and the ballot stock vendor, Printelect had
been guaranteed a monopoly by the state. He said this was another example of the state's poor management.
Mr. Johnson requested the clerk to draft a letter, to be signed by the Chairman and sent to the NCACC and
the legislative delegation, about the ballot costs.
Additionally, Johnson said the state budget did not repeal any of the tax increases, and as a matter
of fact, there were over 200 pork barrel projects included with the smallest one being $10,000.
ACTING COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT: Mrs. Blumenstein said a new federal law
would require local governments to withhold three percent from every payment made to vendors for goods
and supplies. She said the money would then be remitted to the federal government. Blumenstein noted
that Iredell County would be exempted from the action due to being below the $100 million threshold for
supplies/services; however, the reductions local governments received through the bidding procedures
would be impacted. She said the larger units of government would have to withhold the three percent, and
vendors would probably be less willing to give governmental units a better price. Blumenstein said a
senator from Idaho had introduced legislation seeking to reverse the new law. She said that even though
Iredell County would not have to do any of the withholding at the present, the federal government might
start lowering the threshold in the future.
CLOSED SESSION: At 9:40 P.M., Chairman Tice made a motion to enter into closed session
pursuant to G.S. 143.318.11 (a)(3)—Attorney/Client.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
(RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 9:50 P.M.)
ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Chairman Tice to adjourn the meeting until Tuesday,
July 18, 2006 at 5:00 P.M., for the briefing session (South Wing Conference Room) and 7:00 R.M., for
the regular business session (Commissioners' Meeting Room), in the Iredell County Government Center,
200 South Center Street, Statesville, NC.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
Approval:
21
Clerk to the Board